scandinavian journal of immunology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2767 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

scandinavian journal of immunology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name scand j immunol
Abbreviated Name scand j immunol
ISSN 1365-3083
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13653083
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (40 total)

2019
The prognostic value of tumor-associated macrophages in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xu, Xuanxuan;Li, Zhixia;Liu, Jun;Zhu, Fengfeng;Wang, Zhitao;Wang, Jiyu;Zhang, Jiakui;Wang, Huiping;Zhai, Zhimin;
374 views DOI Abstract
2013
diagnosis and management benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (bppv)
;Putu Prida Purnamasari
Vol. 2 , No. 6 , pp. 1056-1080
367 views Abstract
2013
Increased Bronchial Density of CD25+Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells in Occupational Asthma: Relationship to Current Smoking
Sjåheim, T.
Vol. 77 , pp. 398-404
359 views DOI
2019
Comments on and assessments of "Associations between FCGR polymorphisms and immune thrombocytopenia: A meta-analysis".
Gholami, Morteza;Amoli, Mahsa M;Sharifi, Farshad;
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Decoding Inflammation, Its Causes, Genomic Responses, and Emerging Countermeasures.
Hawiger, Jacek;Zienkiewicz, Jozef;
, pp. e12812
311 views DOI Abstract
2014
post traumatic stress disorders (ptsd) with severe depression symptoms with acute psychotic in patient with history as a pedophile victims and domestic violence in 22 years old man : a case report
;I Ketut Agus Indra Adhiputra
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 312-321
291 views Abstract
2018
The real "danger" lies in the failure to confront fundamentals.
Cohn, Melvin;
Vol. 88 , No. 6 , pp. e12726
283 views DOI Abstract
2013
insomnia and correlation with psychosocial factors in primary health care
;Made Gede Cahyadi Permana
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 237-253
264 views Abstract
2013
sunsceen for travellers
;Novita Lavi N
Vol. 2 , No. 6 , pp. 1046-1056
257 views Abstract
2013
occupation commonly associated with contact dermatitis
;Elice Wijaya;Luh Made Mas Rusyati;IGK Darmada
Vol. 2 , No. 12 , pp. 1999-2014
237 views Abstract
View All 40 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.