journal of indian society of periodontology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#431 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 16 hours ago

journal of indian society of periodontology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj
Short Name j indian soc periodontol
Abbreviated Name j indian soc periodontol
ISSN 0972-124X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (46 total)

2015
Effect of scaling and root planing on serum interleukin-10 levels and glycemic control in chronic periodontitis and type 2 diabetes mellitus
Acharya, Anirudh Balakrishna;Thakur, Srinath;Muddapur, Mahadevayya Veerayya;
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 188-193
466 views Abstract
2013
recurrent lower gastrointestinal bleeding: ileal gist diagnosed by video capsule endoscopy—a case report and literature review
;Jie Ling;Marie Lamsen;Roger Coron;Danila Deliana;Sabah Siddiqui;Madhu Rangraj;Stephen Jesmajian
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
315 views DOI Abstract
To detect the minimum inhibitory concentration and time-kill curve of shiitake mushroom on periodontal pathogens: An study.
Sharma, Shikha;Prakash, Shobha;
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 216-219
295 views DOI Abstract
2016
pneumomediastinum secondary to barotrauma after recreational nitrous oxide inhalation
;H. Jeddy;Farhan Rashid;H. Bhutta;B. Lorenzi;A. Charalabopoulos
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
275 views DOI Abstract
2018
adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors on platelet count: a case report and review of the literature
;Subhajit Mukherjee;Tanima Jana;Jen-Jung Pan
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
274 views DOI Abstract
2013
Comparative evaluation of anti-plaque efficacy of herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash in a 4-day plaque re-growth study.
Parwani, Simran R;Parwani, Rajkumar N;Chitnis, P J;Dadlani, Himanshu P;Prasad, Sakur V Sai;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 72-7
263 views DOI Abstract
2013
“unsteady gait”: an uncommon presentation and course of malignant melanoma in terminal ileum—a case report and review of literature
;Satya Allaparthi;Khalid A. Alkimawi
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
250 views DOI
2017
Comparative evaluation of cemental abrasion caused by soft and medium bristle hardness toothbrushes at three predetermined toothbrushing forces: An in vitro study
Joshi, Chaitanya Pradeep;Patil, Agraja Ganpat;Karde, Prerna Ashok;Mahale, Swapna Arunkumar;Dani, Nitin Hemchandra;
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 10-15
245 views Abstract
2013
Gingival crevicular blood: As a non-invasive screening tool for diabetes mellitus in dental clinics
Shetty, Neema;Shankarapillai, Rajesh;Mathur, Lalit Kumar;Manohar, Balaji;Mathur, Aditi;Jain, Meetu;
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 472-477
244 views Abstract
2015
loss of her2 positivity after trastuzumab in her2-positive gastric cancer: is change in her2 status significantly frequent?
;Yu Ishimine;Akira Goto;Yoshito Watanabe;Hidetaka Yajima;Suguru Nakagaki;Takashi Yabana;Takeya Adachi;Yoshihiro Kondo;Kiyoshi Kasai
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
241 views DOI Abstract
View All 46 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.