journal of pharmacognosy and phytotherapy | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1857 / 33,955
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

journal of pharmacognosy and phytotherapy

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name journal of pharmacognosy and phytotherapy
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2015
governance and one health: exploring the impact of federalism and bureaucracy on zoonotic disease detection and reporting
;Heather A. Allen
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 69-83
320 views DOI Abstract
2016
sentinel animals in a one health approach to harmful cyanobacterial and algal blooms
;Lorraine C. Backer;Melissa Miller
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 8-
317 views DOI Abstract
2018
avian respiratory coinfection and impact on avian influenza pathogenicity in domestic poultry: field and experimental findings
;Ahmed Samy;Mahmoud M. Naguib
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 23-
307 views DOI Abstract
2016
an evaluation of quantitative pcr assays (taqman® and sybr green) for the detection of babesia bigemina and babesia bovis, and a novel fluorescent-its1-pcr capillary electrophoresis method for genotyping b. bovis isolates
;Bing Zhang;Jacqueline L. Sambono;Jess A. T. Morgan;Bronwyn Venus;Peter Rolls;Ala E. Lew-Tabor
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 23-
306 views DOI Abstract
2015
New pentacyclic triterpene ester and flavone glycoside from the biologically active extract of Carduus pycnocephalus L.
Hassan W.
Vol. 7 , pp. 46-56
293 views DOI
2017
cutaneous hypersensitivity dermatoses in the feline patient: a review of allergic skin disease in cats
;Alison Diesel
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 25-
275 views DOI Abstract
2018
comparative pathogenicity of wildlife and bovine escherichia coli o157:h7 strains in experimentally inoculated neonatal jersey calves
;Elizabeth M. Antaki-Zukoski;Xunde Li;Patricia A. Pesavento;Tran H. B. Nguyen;Bruce R. Hoar;Edward R. Atwill
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 88-
268 views DOI Abstract
2014
effect of transportation and pre-slaughter handling on welfare and meat quality of cattle: case study of kumasi abattoir, ghana
;Samuel Frimpong;Girma Gebresenbet;Emmanuel Bobobee;Elias D. Aklaku;Ibrahim Hamdu
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. 174-191
264 views DOI Abstract
2016
an alternative vaccination approach for the prevention of highly pathogenic avian influenza subtype h5n1 in the red river delta, vietnam —a geospatial-based cost-effectiveness analysis
;Chinh C. Tran;John F. Yanagida;Sumeet Saksena;Jefferson Fox
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 6-
255 views DOI Abstract
2017
exercise-induced cardiac remodeling: lessons from humans, horses, and dogs
;Rob Shave;Glyn Howatson;Dave Dickson;Lesley Young
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 9-
239 views DOI Abstract
View All 15 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.