Indexed in Journament

Carbohydrate polymers

ISSN 1879-1344· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.0 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #3,465 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
138 Articles
Scores higher than 88.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Carbohydr Polym
Abbreviated Name carbohydr polym
ISSN 1879-1344
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/carbohydrate-polymers

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Carbohydrate polymers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity 57.8 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 10.0 7.8
Content Distribution 70.2 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (138)

2020
Effects of fructans and probiotics on the inhibition of Klebsiella oxytoca and the production of short-chain fatty acids assessed by NMR spectroscopy.
Vol. 248 , pp. 116832
584 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hyaluronic acid behavior in oral administration and perspectives for nanotechnology-based formulations: A review.
Vol. 222 , pp. 115001
565 views DOI Abstract
2019
One-step green synthesis of antibacterial silver nanoparticles embedded in electrospun cyclodextrin nanofibers.
Vol. 207 , pp. 471-479
526 views DOI Abstract
2019
Physicochemical and functional properties of chitosan-based nano-composite films incorporated with biogenic silver nanoparticles.
Vol. 211 , pp. 124-132
498 views DOI Abstract
2020
Biomedical applications of laminarin.
Vol. 232 , pp. 115774
454 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cellulose acetate nanofibers embedded with AgNPs anchored TiO nanoparticles for long term excellent antibacterial applications.
Vol. 207 , pp. 640-649
445 views DOI Abstract
2020
Stimuli induced cellulose nanomaterials alignment and its emerging applications: A review.
Vol. 230 , pp. 115609
426 views DOI Abstract
2024
Versatile synthesis of cellulose film with excellent electrothermal/photothermal dual responsiveness by introducing MXene and small molecule self-assembled nanosphere.
Vol. 343 , pp. 122441
106 views DOI Abstract
2024
Base on photothermal interfacial molecular transfer for efficient biodiesel catalysis via enzyme@cyclodextrin metal-organic frameworks loaded MXene.
Vol. 343 , pp. 122454
128 views DOI Abstract
2020
Cassava starch/carboxymethylcellulose edible films embedded with lactic acid bacteria to extend the shelf life of banana.
Vol. 248 , pp. 116805
354 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effects of fructans and probiotics on the inhibition of Klebsiella oxytoca and the production of short-chain fatty acids assessed by NMR spectroscopy.
Vol. 248 , pp. 116832
584 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
41.0/100 · Below Average
Ranked #3,465 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

57.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.