resources, conservation and recycling | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4026 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

resources, conservation and recycling

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name resources, conservation and recycling
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (44 total)

2019
Applications of information and communication technology for sustainable growth of SMEs in India food industry
Singh R.
Vol. 147 , pp. 10-18
417 views DOI
2020
Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts
Foster, G.
Vol. 152 , pp. 0-0
345 views DOI
2020
Industry 4.0 and circular economy: Operational excellence for sustainable reverse supply chain performance
Dev, N.
Vol. 153 , pp. 0-0
315 views DOI
2019
Simultaneous water and energy integration with isothermal and non-isothermal mixing – A P-graph approach
Chin, H.
Vol. 149 , pp. 687-713
315 views DOI
2013
challenges for municipal solid waste management practices in vietnam
;Nguyen Duc Luong;Hoang Minh Giang;Bui Xuan Thanh;Nguyen The Hung
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 17-21
310 views DOI Abstract
2020
Recycling steel slag from municipal wastewater treatment plants into concrete applications – A step towards circular economy
Roychand, R.
Vol. 152 , pp. 0-0
305 views DOI
2020
Incorporating environmental impacts into the economic evaluation of health care systems: Perspectives from ecological economics
Hensher, M.
Vol. 154 , pp. 0-0
305 views DOI
2019
Public attitudes towards bioplastics – knowledge, perception and end-of-life management
Dilkes-Hoffman, L.
Vol. 151 , pp. 0-0
305 views DOI
2019
Sustainable supply chain management in the chemical industry: Evolution, opportunities, and challenges
A, R.
Vol. 149 , pp. 275-291
283 views DOI
2019
The identification of the domestic waste collection system associated with the least operative musculoskeletal disorders using human Resource absence data
Thomas, D.
Vol. 150 , pp. 0-0
279 views DOI
View All 44 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.