Biological trace element research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8346 / 33,973
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
32
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 22 hours ago

Biological trace element research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name Biol Trace Elem Res
Abbreviated Name biol trace elem res
ISSN 1559-0720
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/12011
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (85 total)

2019
Lentinula edodes as a Source of Bioelements Released into Artificial Digestive Juices and Potential Anti-inflammatory Material.
Muszyńska, Bożena;Kała, Katarzyna;Włodarczyk, Anna;Krakowska, Agata;Ostachowicz, Beata;Gdula-Argasińska, Joanna;Suchocki, Piotr;
526 views DOI Abstract
2019
Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Larvicidal Activities of Spherical Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized by Endophytic Streptomyces spp.
Fouda, Amr;Hassan, Saad El-Din;Abdo, Abdullah M;El-Gamal, Mamdouh S;
470 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Farm Additives on the Potential Bioavailability of Some Nutritional Elements from Kenyan Wild Plants.
Mogwasi, R;Kariuki, D K;Getenga, Z M;
470 views DOI Abstract
2018
Metvan, bis(4,7-Dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline)sulfatooxidovanadium(IV): DFT and Spectroscopic Study-Antitumor Action on Human Bone and Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines.
León, Ignacio E;Ruiz, María C;Franca, Carlos A;Parajón-Costa, Beatriz S;Baran, Enrique J;
457 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nephroprotective Role of Selenium Nanoparticles Against Glycerol-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Rats.
AlBasher, Gadah;Alfarraj, Saleh;Alarifi, Saud;Alkhtani, Saad;Almeer, Rafa;Alsultan, Nouf;Alharthi, Mada;Alotibi, Nouf;Al-Dbass, Abeer;Abdel Moneim, Ahmed E;
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
Contents of Chromium and Arsenic in Tea (Camellia sinensis L.): Extent of Transfer into Tea Infusion and Health Consequence.
Barman, Tupu;Barooah, A K;Goswami, B C;Sharma, Nipom;Panja, Saumik;Khare, Puja;Karak, Tanmoy;
414 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Effect of Selenium on CYP450 Isoform Activity and Expression in Pigs.
Jiang, Zhihui;Gu, Lingbiao;Liang, Xiuli;Cao, Baorui;Zhang, Jingmiao;Guo, Xiao;
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of Selenium-Enriched Yeast Improved Aflatoxin B1-Induced Changes in Growth Performance, Antioxidation Capacity, IL-2 and IFN-γ Contents, and Gene Expression in Mice
Liu, L.
Vol. 191 , pp. 183-188
406 views DOI
2019
Efficiency of the Green Synthesized Nanoparticles as New Tools in Cancer Therapy: Insights on Plant-Based Bioengineered Nanoparticles, Biophysical Properties, and Anticancer Roles.
Karmous, Inès;Pandey, Ashish;Haj, Khemais Ben;Chaoui, Abdelilah;
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fabrication of Ultra-Pure Anisotropic Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles via Simple and Cost-Effective Route: Implications for UTI and EAC Medications.
Abd Elkodous, M;El-Sayyad, Gharieb S;Abdel Maksoud, M I A;Abdelrahman, Ibrahim Y;Mosallam, Farag M;Gobara, Mohamed;El-Batal, Ahmed I;
388 views DOI Abstract
View All 85 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
32
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

32.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.