hno | Journament

Journal Ranking

#356 / 33,944
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

hno

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name hno
Abbreviated Name hno
ISSN 1433-0458
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/106
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2019
[Mediation of data literacy in curricular education in otorhinolaryngology: watch and wait or anticipatory obedience?]
Offergeld, C;Neudert, M;Emerich, M;Schmidt, T;Kuhn, S;Giesler, M;
343 views DOI Abstract
2020
Adenosine production in mesenchymal stromal cells in relation to their developmental status.
Jeske, S S;Theodoraki, M N;Boelke, E;Laban, S;Brunner, C;Rotter, N;Jackson, E K;Hoffmann, T K;Schuler, P J;
Vol. 68 , No. 2 , pp. 87-93
327 views DOI Abstract
2020
[Study protocol of the monocentric prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blind phase II study to explore the protective effects of the ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761® from temporary noise-induced hearing loss].
Mühlmeier, G;Schweikert, A;Schramm, S;Burkart, M;Tisch, M;
, pp. 0-0
326 views DOI Abstract
2018
Guideline “Implantable hearing aids”—short version: German S2k guideline of the Working Group of German-speaking Audiologists, Neurootologists and Otologists (ADANO), of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO) in collaboration with the German Society of Audiology (DGA), the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology (DGPP), and patient representatives
Beutner, D.
Vol. 66 , pp. 654-659
322 views DOI
2019
[Use and acceptance of the ORL logbook for final year students in German university and academic teaching hospitals].
Offergeld, C;Neudert, M;Zahnert, T;Fischer, M;Günther, J;Giesler, M;
318 views DOI Abstract
2018
Eosinophilic esophagitis: an underdiagnosed cause of dysphagia and food impaction to be recognized by otolaryngologists
Górriz, Gil C.
Vol. 66 , pp. 534-542
315 views DOI
2019
Digitalization in Otorhinolaryngology: 90th Annual Meeting 2019 of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Berlin, May 29th–June 1st, 2019
Dazert, S.
Vol. 67 , pp. 322-323
301 views DOI
2019
[Overview on research in the field of medical education].
Wijnen-Meijer, M;Gartmeier, M;Berberat, P O;
290 views DOI Abstract
2001
Meaningfulness of acoustic speech analysis for the prognostic estimation of childhood stuttering. Partial results of a prospective longitudinal study
Brosch, S.
Vol. 49 , pp. 289-297
289 views DOI
2018
Research Today—Future Tomorrow: 89th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery
Wollenberg, B.
Vol. 66 , pp. 254-255
259 views DOI
View All 19 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.