Indexed in Journament

bratislavske lekarske listy

ISSN 0006-9248· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,295 of 33,995 indexed journals
20 Articles
Accessibility 15
Engagement 31
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name bratisl lek listy
Abbreviated Name bratisl lek listy
ISSN 0006-9248

Publications Per Year

Articles (20)

2020
Alterations in the immunoreactivity of laminin, type IV collagen and α3β1 integrin in diabetic rat ovarian follicles.
Vol. 121 , No. 5 , pp. 340-347
436 views DOI Abstract
2019
Platelet mitochondrial bioenergetic analysis in patients with nephropathies and non-communicable diseases: a new method.
Vol. 120 , No. 9 , pp. 630-635
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy based on speckle tracking.
Vol. 120 , No. 8 , pp. 552-557
415 views DOI Abstract
2020
MicroRNAs expression profiles as biomarkers and therapeutic tools in Turkish patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Vol. 121 , No. 2 , pp. 159-163
382 views DOI Abstract
2020
Intra-arterial transplantation of neural stem cells improve functional recovery after transient ischemic stroke in adult rats.
Vol. 121 , No. 1 , pp. 8-13
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
The alpha-2 receptor agonist dexmedetomidine attenuates vancomycin‑induced acute kidney injury.
Vol. 120 , No. 6 , pp. 429-433
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hereditary bilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
Vol. 120 , No. 9 , pp. 699-702
357 views DOI Abstract
2011
Reconstructive surgery after postraumatic infected talus necrosis.
Vol. 112 , No. 5 , pp. 290-1
296 views Abstract
2020
Monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio: a prognostic factor for mitral valve prolapse?
Vol. 121 , No. 2 , pp. 151-153
295 views DOI Abstract
2020
miR-485-3p suppresses colorectal cancer via targeting TPX2.
Vol. 121 , No. 4 , pp. 302-307
285 views DOI Abstract
2021
Analysis of clinical efficiency and early postoperative complications after cranioplasty
Vol. 122 , No. 7 , pp. -
265 views Abstract
2020
Exogenous follistatin administration ameliorates cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury through anti-inflammation and anti-apoptosis effects.
Vol. 121 , No. 2 , pp. 143-150
253 views DOI Abstract
2020
Monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio: a prognostic factor for mitral valve prolapse?
Vol. 121 , No. 2 , pp. 151-153
295 views DOI Abstract
2020
MicroRNAs expression profiles as biomarkers and therapeutic tools in Turkish patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Vol. 121 , No. 2 , pp. 159-163
382 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ribotypes in isolates and testing algorithm of C. difficile infections in the studied sample.
Vol. 121 , No. 3 , pp. 182-187
216 views DOI Abstract
2020
Alterations in the immunoreactivity of laminin, type IV collagen and α3β1 integrin in diabetic rat ovarian follicles.
Vol. 121 , No. 5 , pp. 340-347
436 views DOI Abstract
2020
Low concentrations of morphine enhanced the neuroglia-like differentiation.
Vol. 121 , No. 4 , pp. 271-277
220 views DOI Abstract
2020
Pro-inflammatory mediators in vaginal fluid and short cervical length in pregnancy.
Vol. 121 , No. 4 , pp. 278-281
208 views DOI Abstract
2020
miR-485-3p suppresses colorectal cancer via targeting TPX2.
Vol. 121 , No. 4 , pp. 302-307
285 views DOI Abstract
2020
Intra-arterial transplantation of neural stem cells improve functional recovery after transient ischemic stroke in adult rats.
Vol. 121 , No. 1 , pp. 8-13
380 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,295 of 33,995

Overall Quality Score

38.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.