journal of neurological surgery part b, skull base | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3935 / 33,968
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

journal of neurological surgery part b, skull base

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name j neurol surg b skull base
Abbreviated Name j neurol surg b skull base
ISSN 2193-6331
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2019
Technique for Latex Injection and Reuse of Human Heads Preserved in Formaldehyde.
Dolci, Ricardo L L;Burchianti, Lívia Castellari;Todeschini, Alexandre Bossi;Lopes, Andre Fanhani;Barros, Mirna Duarte;Santos, Américo Rubens Leite Dos;Lazarini, Paulo Roberto;
Vol. 80 , No. 3 , pp. 270-275
339 views DOI Abstract
2018
A Rare Complication of Endovascular Embolization: Extruded Onyx on Trigeminal Nerve.
Eser Ocak, Pinar;Başkaya, Mustafa Kemal;
Vol. 79 , No. Suppl 5 , pp. S422-S423
273 views DOI Abstract
2012
christian iv’s tugt- og børnehus. social institution eller merkantilistisk foretagende?
;Peter Agerbo Jensen
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. -
233 views Abstract
2012
”tusinder af vingeskudte trækfugle”. soldatergrave og dansk-franske erindringssteder 1915-1925 ca.
;Ning de Coninck-Smith
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. -
227 views DOI Abstract
2015
fra forfald til forbedring. Ændrede opfattelser af ældres sundhed i danmark i det 20. århundrede
;Tenna Jensen
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 55-74
199 views DOI Abstract
2016
„ju ben een creol waer-waer“
;Troels Peter Roland
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 159-187
190 views DOI Abstract
2014
mod nye frugtmarkeder. forarbejdning af naturressourcer i kulturanalyse
;Frida Hastrup
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 8-23
182 views DOI Abstract
2013
revolutionen i sæby
;Jørgen Mührmann-Lund
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 34-57
158 views Abstract
2012
det havde været mere rationelt straks at lægge pengene i skraldespanden…
;Sigrid Leilund
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 43-72
156 views Abstract
2010
migrationsnarrativer: fortællinger om den gode slægtning blandt vestindiske kvinder
;Karen Fog Olwig
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 119-177
146 views DOI Abstract
View All 11 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.