Indexed in Journament

jiegou huaxue

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,683 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
39 Articles
Scores higher than 49.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name jiegou huaxue

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 81.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility — 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 0.0 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 3.6 4.2
Content Distribution 81.2 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (39)

2018
Synthesis, crystal structure and photophysical property of 2-(9H-carbazol-9-yl)-3-(2-(2,4,5-tri-(9H-carbazol-9-yl)-3,6-dicyanophenoxy)phenoxy) dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxine-1,4-dicarbonitrile
Dong Y.
Vol. 37 , pp. 1433-1439
370 views DOI
2017
identifying trauma-related and mental health needs: the implementation of screening in california’s child welfare systems
;Brent R. Crandal;Andrea L. Hazen;Jennifer Rolls Reutz
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 335-348
347 views DOI Abstract
2017
feasibility, acceptability, and clinical trends of a mindfulness-informed child welfare intervention: implications for trauma-focused practice
;Samantha M. Brown;Jennifer Bellamy
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 369-386
340 views DOI Abstract
2012
assessment of ptsd in older veterans: the posttraumatic stress disorder checklist: military version (pcl-m)
;Jeffrey S. Yarvis;Eunkyung Yoon;Margaret Ameuke;Sandra Simien-Turner;Grace Landers
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 185-202
326 views Abstract
2009
intergenerational groups: rediscovering our legacy
;Scott P. Anstadt;Deb Byster
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 39-50
321 views Abstract
2016
bulletproofing the psyche: mindfulness interventions in the training environment to improve resilience in the military and veteran communities
;Kate Hendricks Thomas;Sarah Plummer Taylor
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 312-322
312 views DOI Abstract
2001
identity and multicultural social work research: a reflection in process
;Michael S. Spencer
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
310 views Abstract
2007
reassembling the social environment: a network approack to human behavior
;Dhrubodhi Mukherjee
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 208-218
304 views Abstract
2005
social work values and ethics: reflections on the profession's odssey
;Frederic G. Reamer
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 24-32
288 views Abstract
2012
‘doing’ social work: critical considerations on theory and practice in social work
;Marcus Herz;Thomas Johansson
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 527-540
282 views Abstract
2019
Ab Initio Study of Mechanism of Forming a Si-heterocyclic Spiro-Sn-heterocyclic Ring Compound by Cycloaddition Reaction of Cl<inf>2</inf>Si=Sn: And ethylene<sup>①</sup>
Tan, X.
Vol. 38 , pp. 673-678
196 views DOI
2018
Synthesis, crystal structure and photophysical property of 2-(9H-carbazol-9-yl)-3-(2-(2,4,5-tri-(9H-carbazol-9-yl)-3,6-dicyanophenoxy)phenoxy) dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxine-1,4-dicarbonitrile
Dong Y.
Vol. 37 , pp. 1433-1439
370 views DOI
2017
identifying trauma-related and mental health needs: the implementation of screening in california’s child welfare systems
;Brent R. Crandal;Andrea L. Hazen;Jennifer Rolls Reutz
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 335-348
347 views DOI Abstract
2017
feasibility, acceptability, and clinical trends of a mindfulness-informed child welfare intervention: implications for trauma-focused practice
;Samantha M. Brown;Jennifer Bellamy
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 369-386
340 views DOI Abstract
2016
bulletproofing the psyche: mindfulness interventions in the training environment to improve resilience in the military and veteran communities
;Kate Hendricks Thomas;Sarah Plummer Taylor
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 312-322
312 views DOI Abstract
2016
engaged teaching-learning: outcome evaluation for social work students in a graduate-level service learning research course
;Stacy M. Deck;Phyllis A. Platt;Laneshia McCord
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 233-248
269 views DOI Abstract
2016
Synthesis, Crystal Structure and Biological Activity of 4-Amino-2,4-dihydro-5-((3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)methyl)-3H-1,2,4-Triazole-3-Thione Schiff Base
Wang, Z.
Vol. 35 , pp. 212-218
191 views DOI
2015
a game-based intervention – a technical tool for social workers to combat adolescent dating-violence
;Emma Sorbring;Anette Bolin;Jennie Ryding
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 125-139
247 views Abstract
2015
Synthesis, structure and biological activity of 3-Methyl-4-(3-nitrobenzylideneamino)-5-ethoxycarbonyl-methylsulfanyl-1,2,4-triazole
Yang, Q.
Vol. 34 , pp. 197-202
170 views DOI
2014
social distancing of depressive and panic disorders in an international sample of social work students
;Donna S. Wang;Scott Smith;Chris R. Locke
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 480-494
226 views Abstract
Journament Score
31.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,683 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

31.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

0.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

81.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.