new phytologist | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3828 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

new phytologist

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name new phytologist
Abbreviated Name
ISSN 0028-646X
Aim and Scope
URL https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14698137
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2015
total hip arthroplasty in failed hip fractures: a case series
;Syed Shahid Noor
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. -
291 views DOI Abstract
2017
Think globally, research locally: emerging opportunities for mycorrhizal research in South America: First international mycorrhizal meeting in South America, ‘Mycorrhizal symbiosis in the southern cone of South America’, Valdivia, Chile, 6–9 March 2017
Bueno, C.
Vol. 215 , pp. 1306-1309
277 views DOI
2019
Research must use a systems agronomy approach if management of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis is to contribute to sustainable intensification
Ryan, M.
Vol. 222 , pp. 1176-1178
268 views DOI
2018
The future has roots in the past: the ideas and scientists that shaped mycorrhizal research
Bonfante, P.
Vol. 220 , pp. 982-995
263 views DOI
2017
the effect of patellar denervation by circumpatellar electrocautery on anterior knee pain following total knee replacement – an experimental study
;Balaji Zacharia;Manu Paul
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. -
256 views DOI Abstract
2019
Seed life span and food security
Colville, L.
, pp. 0-0
247 views DOI
2016
Bacterial RNA - A new MAMP on the block?
Panstruga R.
Vol. 209 , pp. 458-460
246 views DOI
2016
robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty after chiari pelvic osteotomy: a case report
;Marius Dettmer;Amir Pourmoghaddam;Stefan W Kreuzer
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. -
236 views DOI Abstract
2017
a single surgeon, 10 year experience with the oxford partial knee system: what a difference experience, instruments, implants, and technique can make
;David Mauerhan;Nigel L Rozario
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. -
214 views DOI Abstract
2020
Doing ‘business as usual’ comes with a cost: evaluating energy cost of maintaining plant intracellular K<sup>+</sup> homeostasis under saline conditions
Rubio, F.
Vol. 225 , pp. 1097-1104
202 views DOI
View All 20 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.