methods in molecular biology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2664 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

methods in molecular biology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name methods in molecular biology
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/bookseries/7651
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (42 total)

2017
MAPK assays in Arabidopsis MAMP-PRR signal transduction
Chung H.
Vol. 1578 , pp. 155-166
334 views DOI
2016
Quantitative analysis of microbe-associated molecular pattern (MAMP)-induced Ca<sup>2+</sup> transients in plants
Trempel F.
Vol. 1398 , pp. 331-344
322 views DOI
2020
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Detection of Viral Nucleic Acids in Oncolytic H-1 Parvovirus-Treated Human Brain Tumors
Kiprianova, I.
Vol. 2058 , pp. 295-306
313 views DOI
2019
Synthesis of doxorubicin and miRNA stimuli-sensitive conjugates for combination therapy
Costa, D.
Vol. 1974 , pp. 99-109
303 views DOI
2020
In vivo phosphorylation: Development of specific antibodies to detect the phosphorylated pepc isoform for the c4 photosynthesis in zea mays
Ueno, Y.
Vol. 2072 , pp. 217-240
296 views DOI
2019
Overview of biotechnology-derived herbicide tolerance and insect resistance traits in plant agriculture
Mall, T.
Vol. 1864 , pp. 313-342
292 views DOI
2016
Tracing plant defense responses in roots upon MAMP/DAMP treatment
Hiruma K.
Vol. 1398 , pp. 319-322
273 views DOI
2020
Primary cultures of pure embryonic dorsal root ganglia sensory neurons as a new cellular model for friedreich’s ataxia
Griso, O.
Vol. 2056 , pp. 241-253
267 views DOI
2019
Studies of the secretory machinery dynamics by total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells
Villanueva, J.
Vol. 1860 , pp. 379-389
253 views DOI
2017
Directional freezing of ovarian tissue and freeze-drying of stem cells for fertility preservation
Arav, A.
Vol. 1568 , pp. 223-229
244 views DOI
View All 42 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.