plant cell | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2924 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

plant cell

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name plant cell
Abbreviated Name
ISSN 1040-4651
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.plantcell.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2015
Transcriptional dynamics driving MAMP-triggered immunity and pathogen effector-mediated immunosuppression in Arabidopsis leaves following infection with Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000
Lewis L.
Vol. 27 , pp. 3038-3064
414 views DOI
2017
Erratum to: Induced genome-wide binding of three Arabidopsis WRKY transcription factors during early MAMP-triggered immunity (Plant Cell 29, 2017, 20-38)
not found
Vol. 29 , pp. 1175
399 views DOI
2017
Induced genome-wide binding of three arabidopsis WRKY transcription factors during early MAMP-triggered immunity
Birkenbihl R.
Vol. 29 , pp. 20-38
364 views DOI
2014
“swimming ducks forecast the coming of spring”—the predictability of aggregate insider trading on future market returns in the chinese market
;Chafen Zhu;Li Wang;Tengfei Yang
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 179-201
280 views DOI Abstract
2013
state ownership and firm performance: empirical evidence from chinese listed companies
;Mei Yu
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 75-87
240 views DOI Abstract
2018
does independent directors’ monitoring affect reputation? evidence from the stock and labor markets
;Jun Du;Qingchuan Hou;Xuesong Tang;Yiwei Yao
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 91-127
234 views Abstract
2014
does high-quality auditing decrease the use of collateral? analysis from the perspective of lenders’ self-protection
;Yang Yang
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 203-221
225 views DOI Abstract
2018
religious atmosphere and the cost of equity capital: evidence from china
;Ning Hu;Hong Chen;Muhua Liu
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 151-169
214 views Abstract
2013
a fundamentalist perspective on accounting and implications for accounting
;Guohua Jiang;Stephen Penman
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 233-245
192 views DOI Abstract
2016
female cfos and loan contracting: financial conservatism or gender discrimination? – an empirical test based on collateral clauses
;Xixiong Xu;Yaoqin Li;Mengmeng Chang
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 153-173
184 views DOI Abstract
View All 18 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.