Indexed in Journament

plant journal

ISSN 0960-7412· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.7 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #8,588 of 33,995 indexed journals
23 Articles
Accessibility 35
Engagement 30
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name plant journal
ISSN 0960-7412
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1365313X

Publications Per Year

Articles (23)

2018
prognostic utility of histological growth patterns of colorectal lung oligometastasis
Vol. 52 , No. 2 , pp. 98-104
431 views DOI Abstract
2016
clinicopathologic correlations of e-cadherin and prrx-1 expression loss in hepatocellular carcinoma
Vol. 50 , No. 5 , pp. 327-336
398 views DOI Abstract
2016
sirt7, h3k18ac, and elk4 immunohistochemical expression in hepatocellular carcinoma
Vol. 50 , No. 5 , pp. 337-344
386 views DOI Abstract
2015
overexpression of c-reactive protein as a poor prognostic marker of resectable hepatocellular carcinomas
Vol. 49 , No. 2 , pp. 105-111
355 views DOI Abstract
2017
higher expression of toll-like receptors 3, 7, 8, and 9 in pityriasis rosea
Vol. 51 , No. 2 , pp. 148-151
314 views DOI Abstract
2016
aquaporin 1 is an independent marker of poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma
Vol. 50 , No. 4 , pp. 251-257
285 views DOI Abstract
2017
prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: comparative analysis with partial hepatectomy
Vol. 51 , No. 1 , pp. 79-86
281 views DOI Abstract
2018
prognostic utility of histological growth patterns of colorectal lung oligometastasis
Vol. 52 , No. 2 , pp. 98-104
431 views DOI Abstract
2017
prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: comparative analysis with partial hepatectomy
Vol. 51 , No. 1 , pp. 79-86
281 views DOI Abstract
2017
clear cell renal cell carcinoma with intratumoral granulomatous reaction: a case report and review of the literature
Vol. 51 , No. 3 , pp. 325-328
193 views DOI Abstract
2017
higher expression of toll-like receptors 3, 7, 8, and 9 in pityriasis rosea
Vol. 51 , No. 2 , pp. 148-151
314 views DOI Abstract
2017
diagnostic significance of cellular neuroglial tissue in ovarian immature teratoma
Vol. 51 , No. 1 , pp. 49-55
250 views DOI Abstract
2017
perivascular epithelioid cell tumor in the stomach
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 428-432
268 views DOI Abstract
2017
a small case series of intravascular large b-cell lymphoma with unexpected findings: subset of cases with concomitant extravascular central nervous system (cns) involvement mimicking primary cns lymphoma
Vol. 51 , No. 3 , pp. 284-291
244 views DOI Abstract
2017
mesothelin expression in gastric adenocarcinoma and its relation to clinical outcomes
Vol. 51 , No. 2 , pp. 122-128
91 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
40.7/100 · Below Average
Ranked #8,588 of 33,995

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.