Indexed in Journament

Frontiers in medicine

ISSN 2296-858X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
47.5 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #314 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
29 Articles
Scores higher than 98.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Front Med (Lausanne)
Abbreviated Name front med (lausanne)
ISSN 2296-858X
URL http://www.frontiersin.org/medicine

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Frontiers in medicine
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 60.0 3.0
Diversity 71.7 25.8
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 11.4 4.2
Content Distribution 60.7 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (29)

2019
Recommendations for Regulating the Environmental Risk of Shedding for Gene Therapy and Oncolytic Viruses in Canada.
Vol. 6 , pp. 58
538 views DOI Abstract
2020
Erythropoietin Derived Peptide Improved Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Ischemia-Reperfusion Related Cellular and Renal Injury.
Vol. 7 , pp. 5
500 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of a Healthy Lifestyle Assessment Toolkit for the General Public.
Vol. 6 , pp. 134
441 views DOI Abstract
2019
Best Practices of Blood Cultures in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
Vol. 6 , pp. 131
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Machine Learning Increases Diagnosticity in Psychometric Evaluation of Alexithymia in Fibromyalgia.
Vol. 6 , pp. 319
416 views DOI Abstract
2019
DTI Profiles for Rapid Description of Cohorts at the Clinical-Research Interface
Vol. 5 , pp. -
412 views Abstract
2018
DTI Profiles for Rapid Description of Cohorts at the Clinical-Research Interface.
Vol. 5 , pp. 357
407 views DOI Abstract
2018
A Conceptual Framework for Optimizing Blood Matching Strategies: Balancing Patient Complications Against Total Costs Incurred
Vol. 5 , pp. -
389 views Abstract
2025
The effects of cognitive-motor multitasking demands on the quality of chest compressions in CPR-A randomized controlled trial.
Vol. 12 , pp. 1536796
119 views DOI Abstract
2023
Speaking of sepsis: semantics, syntax, and slang.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1250499
134 views DOI Abstract
2023
Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1295633
130 views DOI Abstract
2022
Epidemiological Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Variants During Social Protests in Cali, Colombia.
Vol. 9 , pp. 863911
93 views DOI Abstract
2022
Behçet uveitis: Current practice and future perspectives.
Vol. 9 , pp. 968345
174 views DOI Abstract
2022
Novel oxazolidinones harbor potent in vitro activity against the clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in China
Vol. 9 , pp. -
82 views DOI Abstract
2022
The association of antiviral drugs with COVID-19 morbidity: The retrospective analysis of a nationwide COVID-19 cohort
Vol. 9 , pp. -
220 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comparison of Early vs. Delayed Anakinra Treatment in Patients With Adult Onset Still's Disease and Effect on Clinical and Laboratory Outcomes.
Vol. 7 , pp. 42
301 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Malnutritional Status of the Host as a Virulence Factor for New Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2
Vol. 7 , pp. -
258 views
2020
Erythropoietin Derived Peptide Improved Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Ischemia-Reperfusion Related Cellular and Renal Injury.
Vol. 7 , pp. 5
500 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
47.5/100 · Below Average
Ranked #314 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

47.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

71.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.