Indexed in Journament

Frontiers in medicine

ISSN 2296-858X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.1/100
Journament Score
#8,816
Journament Rank
29
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Front Med (Lausanne)
Abbreviated Name front med (lausanne)
ISSN 2296-858X
URL http://www.frontiersin.org/medicine

Indexings

scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (29)

2019
Recommendations for Regulating the Environmental Risk of Shedding for Gene Therapy and Oncolytic Viruses in Canada.
Vol. 6 , pp. 58
485 views DOI Abstract
2020
Erythropoietin Derived Peptide Improved Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Ischemia-Reperfusion Related Cellular and Renal Injury.
Vol. 7 , pp. 5
437 views DOI Abstract
2019
Best Practices of Blood Cultures in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
Vol. 6 , pp. 131
399 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of a Healthy Lifestyle Assessment Toolkit for the General Public.
Vol. 6 , pp. 134
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Machine Learning Increases Diagnosticity in Psychometric Evaluation of Alexithymia in Fibromyalgia.
Vol. 6 , pp. 319
372 views DOI Abstract
2018
DTI Profiles for Rapid Description of Cohorts at the Clinical-Research Interface.
Vol. 5 , pp. 357
352 views DOI Abstract
2018
A Conceptual Framework for Optimizing Blood Matching Strategies: Balancing Patient Complications Against Total Costs Incurred
Vol. 5 , pp. -
351 views Abstract
2019
DTI Profiles for Rapid Description of Cohorts at the Clinical-Research Interface
Vol. 5 , pp. -
350 views Abstract
2025
The effects of cognitive-motor multitasking demands on the quality of chest compressions in CPR-A randomized controlled trial.
Vol. 12 , pp. 1536796
80 views DOI Abstract
2023
Speaking of sepsis: semantics, syntax, and slang.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1250499
83 views DOI Abstract
2023
Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation.
Vol. 10 , pp. 1295633
67 views DOI Abstract
2022
Epidemiological Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Variants During Social Protests in Cali, Colombia.
Vol. 9 , pp. 863911
41 views DOI Abstract
2022
Behçet uveitis: Current practice and future perspectives.
Vol. 9 , pp. 968345
124 views DOI Abstract
2022
Novel oxazolidinones harbor potent in vitro activity against the clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in China
Vol. 9 , pp. -
36 views DOI Abstract
2022
The association of antiviral drugs with COVID-19 morbidity: The retrospective analysis of a nationwide COVID-19 cohort
Vol. 9 , pp. -
159 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comparison of Early vs. Delayed Anakinra Treatment in Patients With Adult Onset Still's Disease and Effect on Clinical and Laboratory Outcomes.
Vol. 7 , pp. 42
256 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Malnutritional Status of the Host as a Virulence Factor for New Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2
Vol. 7 , pp. -
190 views
2020
Erythropoietin Derived Peptide Improved Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Ischemia-Reperfusion Related Cellular and Renal Injury.
Vol. 7 , pp. 5
437 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.