trac trends in analytical chemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4003 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

trac trends in analytical chemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name trac trends in analytical chemistry
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (36 total)

2005
Application of ionic liquids in analytical chemistry
Liu, Jing-fu;Jiang, Gui-bin;J\onsson, Jan \AAke
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 20-27
346 views
2016
farmacocinética comparada de metformina, en forma sólida y en formulación extemporánea líquida para pediatría, en voluntarios adultos sanos
;L Rivera-Espinosa;G Pérez-Guillé;JL Chávez-Pacheco;LM Torres-Espíndola;H Juárez-Olguín;R Alemón-Medina
Vol. 37 , No. 4 , pp. 191-203
302 views DOI Abstract
2014
hypercortisolism and hyperandrogenism as manifestions of adrenal adenoma. report of a mexican girl and review of the literature
;de Baro Álvarez Paola;García García Lizbeth;Reyes Posada Olinka
Vol. 35 , No. 1 , pp. 38-44
293 views DOI Abstract
2014
classification of biomarkers in central nervous system diseases
;Gómez Hernández Fernando A.;Sampieri III Aristides;Carmona Aparicio Liliana
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 171-172
225 views DOI Abstract
2014
total anomalous connection of pulmonary veins to the portal vein. value of multislice angiotomography. report on three cases
;Sara Alejandra Solórzano-Morales;Francisco Javier López-Elías;Javier Horacio López-Terrazas;Max Alberto Bernal-Moreno;Alexis Javier Palacios-Macedo-Quenot;Alfredo Bobadilla-Aguirre
Vol. 35 , No. 1 , pp. 22-29
219 views DOI Abstract
2014
concurrent measurement of total transcutaneous bilirubin over forehead and sternum as predictive model for total serum bilirubin in prem ature and term newborns
;Martínez Mercado María Esther;Torres Bernal Luis Fernando;Góngora Ortega Javier
Vol. 35 , No. 2 , pp. 118-124
210 views DOI Abstract
2014
reunion off specialists in pediatrics, obstetrics and nutrition on the use of natural water to keep healthy
;Arredondo García José Luis
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. -
209 views DOI Abstract
2014
ophthalmologic findings in patients with inborn errors of metabolism
;Guevara Márquez Yamel Carolina;Vela Amieva Marcela;Juárez Echenique Juan Carlos
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 212-224
186 views DOI Abstract
2016
respuesta a carta al editor sobre articulo "adaptación de la iowa infant feeding attitude scale en población mexicana"
;Alejandra Coronado-Castilleja;Hilda Juanita Aguilar-Navarro;Orlando Gómez-Hernández;Héctor Cobos-Aguilar
Vol. 38 , No. 4 , pp. 293-294
180 views DOI Abstract
2014
successful resection of a chordoma through a le fort i osteotomy and sagittal maxiliar. report of a case
;Castillo Ham Guillermina;Téllez Rodríguez Jorge;Shalkow Klincovstein Jaime
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 77-80
178 views DOI Abstract
View All 36 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.