journal of the american water resources association | Journament

Journal Ranking

#189 / 33,955
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of the american water resources association

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name j am water resour assoc
Abbreviated Name j am water resour assoc
ISSN 1093-474X
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17521688
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2018
Managing Uncertainty in Runoff Estimation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Stormwater Calculator
Schifman L.
Vol. 54 , pp. 148-159
350 views DOI
2019
Managing Uncertainty in Runoff Estimation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Stormwater Calculator.
Schifman, L A;Tryby, M E;Berner, J;Shuster, W D;
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. 148-159
300 views DOI Abstract
2019
Developing Subseasonal to Seasonal Climate Forecast Products for Hydrology and Water Management
Baker, S.
Vol. 55 , pp. 1024-1037
287 views DOI
2014
satisfaction as mediators of the relationship between motivation and loyalty of diving tourists to bali
;I Wayan Suardana;I Komang Gde Bendesa;Made Antara
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. -
262 views DOI Abstract
2014
factors influencing tourists’ revisit to bali as mice destination
;Ni Made Eka Mahadewi;I Komang Gde Bendesa;Made Antara
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. -
254 views DOI Abstract
2016
balinese women in the cruise ships tourism industry
;I Made Darma Oka;Made Antara;I Gede Mudana
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. -
240 views DOI Abstract
2016
the influence of services quality to domestic tourists’ loyalty through domestic tourists’ satisfaction at mount bromo tourism in east java indonesia
;Rizki Amelia;Santi Palupi
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. -
233 views DOI Abstract
2016
the study on bali tourism village management towards four dimensions of experience economy
;Widi Hardini;Ni Luh Putu Agustini Karta;Jimmy Harry Putu Suarthana
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. -
224 views DOI Abstract
2019
Variations in Newspaper Coverage on Water in the U.S. Intermountain West
Flint, C.
Vol. 55 , pp. 1306-1322
178 views DOI
2016
tourism and forestry collaboration in bali-indonesia
;I Gusti Bagus Rai Utama
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. -
177 views DOI Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.