american journal of infection control | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2115 / 33,957
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

american journal of infection control

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name am j infect control
Abbreviated Name am j infect control
ISSN 1527-3296
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/american-journal-of-infection-control
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (29 total)

2000
HIV and diarrhea in the era of HAART: 1998 New York State hospitalizations
Anastasi JK;Capili B;;
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. -
409 views Abstract
2019
Wet contact time directly impacts antimicrobial efficacy of Environmental Protection Agency–registered disinfectants
Teska P.
Vol. 47 , pp. 474-476
401 views DOI
2019
There is no additional bactericidal efficacy of Environmental Protection Agency–registered disinfectant towelettes after surface drying or beyond label contact time
West A.
Vol. 47 , pp. 27-32
382 views DOI
2019
Perceptions of Patients, Health Care Workers, and Environmental Services Staff Regarding Ultraviolet Light Room Decontamination Devices
Dunn, A.
Vol. 47 , pp. 1290-1293
349 views DOI
2019
Factors influencing the adherence of nurses to standard precautions in South Korea hospital settings.
Oh, Eunja;Choi, Jeong Sil;
333 views DOI Abstract
2020
Could the prevention of health care-associated infections increase hospital cost? The financial impact of health care-associated infections from a hospital management perspective.
Shepard, John;Frederick, John;Wong, Frances;Madison, Sasha;Tompkins, Lucy;Hadhazy, Eric;
Vol. 48 , No. 3 , pp. 255-260
319 views DOI Abstract
2019
Health care-associated infection surveillance system in Iran: Reporting and accuracy.
Seifi, Arash;Dehghan-Nayeri, Nahid;Rostamnia, Leili;Varaei, Shokoh;Akbari Sari, Ali;Haghani, Hamid;Ghanbari, Vahid;
Vol. 47 , No. 8 , pp. 951-955
285 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of patient comorbidities on surgical site infection within 90 days of primary and revision joint (hip and knee) replacement
Edmiston, C.
Vol. 47 , pp. 1225-1232
263 views DOI
2020
Low-cost production of handrubs and face shields in developing countries fighting the COVID19 pandemic
Khurana, S.
, pp. 0-0
252 views DOI
2016
clinical utility, safety, and efficacy of pregabalin in the treatment of fibromyalgia
;Bhusal S;Diomampo S;Magrey MN
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 13-23
249 views Abstract
View All 29 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.