Indexed in Journament

Nucleic Acids Research

ISSN 1362-4962· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
45.2 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #335 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
1,217 Articles
Scores higher than 98.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Nucleic Acids Research
Abbreviated Name nucleic acids res
ISSN 1362-4962
URL http://nar.oxfordjournals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Nucleic Acids Research
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 90.0 9.2
Diversity 81.5 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 5.0 7.8
Content Distribution 12.9 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (1,217)

2011
Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information
Vol. 39 , No. Database issue , pp. -
560 views Abstract
2001
rrndb: the Ribosomal RNA Operon Copy Number Database
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. -
547 views Abstract
2007
CPC: assess the protein-coding potential of transcripts using sequence features and support vector machine
Vol. 35 , No. Web Server issue , pp. -
538 views Abstract
2012
Ensembl 2012
Vol. 40 , No. Database issue , pp. -
477 views Abstract
1999
Amplification of cDNA ends based on template-switching effect and step-out PCR
Vol. 27 , No. 6 , pp. 1558-1560
472 views Abstract
2019
BioUML: an integrated environment for systems biology and collaborative analysis of biomedical data.
Vol. 47 , No. W1 , pp. W225-W233
467 views DOI Abstract
2003
Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. -
449 views Abstract
2019
Inositol pyrophosphates impact phosphate homeostasis via modulation of RNA 3' processing and transcription termination.
448 views DOI Abstract
2008
EPGD: a comprehensive web resource for integrating and displaying eukaryotic paralog/paralogon information
Vol. 36 , No. Database issue , pp. -
444 views Abstract
1999
UTRdb: a specialized database of 5' and 3' untranslated regions of eukaryotic mRNAs
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. -
439 views Abstract
2026
Modeling conformational transitions in DNA, RNA, and protein–nucleic acid complexes
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Synergistic interaction between the macrophage polarizing signals IL-4 and IFNγ is controlled by the STAT6/STAT1/IRF1 axis
16 views DOI Abstract
2026
The tumor suppressor menin is a key scaffold mediator for homologous recombination repair
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
Sam68 stimulates polymerase theta-mediated end-joining by suppressing poison exon inclusion in <i>Polq</i> mRNA
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
An integrative workflow for lncRNA orthology detection and its application to 13 evolutionarily diverse species
24 views DOI Abstract
2026
Structural adaptations for enhanced translation kinetics in evolved ribosomes
30 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
45.2/100 · Below Average
Ranked #335 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

45.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

81.5/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

12.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.