Indexed in Journament

Nucleic Acids Research

ISSN 1362-4962· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
46.3 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #411 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
1,229 Articles
Scores higher than 98.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Nucleic Acids Research
Abbreviated Name nucleic acids res
ISSN 1362-4962
URL http://nar.oxfordjournals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Nucleic Acids Research
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 72.8 25.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 9.3 4.1
Content Distribution 17.3 89.1
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (1,229)

2011
Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information
Vol. 39 , No. Database issue , pp. -
580 views Abstract
2001
rrndb: the Ribosomal RNA Operon Copy Number Database
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. -
569 views Abstract
2007
CPC: assess the protein-coding potential of transcripts using sequence features and support vector machine
Vol. 35 , No. Web Server issue , pp. -
557 views Abstract
2012
Ensembl 2012
Vol. 40 , No. Database issue , pp. -
492 views Abstract
1999
Amplification of cDNA ends based on template-switching effect and step-out PCR
Vol. 27 , No. 6 , pp. 1558-1560
484 views Abstract
2019
BioUML: an integrated environment for systems biology and collaborative analysis of biomedical data.
Vol. 47 , No. W1 , pp. W225-W233
480 views DOI Abstract
2003
Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. -
466 views Abstract
2008
EPGD: a comprehensive web resource for integrating and displaying eukaryotic paralog/paralogon information
Vol. 36 , No. Database issue , pp. -
462 views Abstract
2019
Inositol pyrophosphates impact phosphate homeostasis via modulation of RNA 3' processing and transcription termination.
460 views DOI Abstract
1999
UTRdb: a specialized database of 5' and 3' untranslated regions of eukaryotic mRNAs
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. -
460 views Abstract
2026
Molecular structure and DNA binding mode of unsymmetric cyanine dyes RiboGreen and OliGreen
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
VDJdb in 2026: boosting T-cell receptor recognition evidence using paratope embeddings and AI-based structure prediction
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Altered neuronal start codon stringency favors cap-independent repeat-associated non-AUG translation
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
The alarmone pGpp inhibits translation through GTP depletion
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
Ribosome dynamics at the conserved PGP motif governs 2A peptide-bond-skipping efficiency
21 views DOI Abstract
2026
Enhancing prediction accuracy for enzyme activity engineering through sequence co-evolution and epistatic relationship modeling
15 views DOI Abstract
2026
ProRB: a structure-free unified framework for joint prediction and design of protein–RNA interactions
18 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
46.3/100 · Below Average
Ranked #411 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

46.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

72.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

17.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.