Indexed in Journament

zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [chinese journal of preventive medicine]

ISSN 0253-9624· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #21,579 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
28 Articles
Scores higher than 26.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi
Abbreviated Name zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi
ISSN 0253-9624
URL http://www.pubhealth.org.cn/cn/page.asp?pageid=10.html

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [chinese journal of preventive medicine]
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.3
Accessibility 20.0 18.3
Timeliness 0.0 12.6
Diversity 5.6 27.3
Innovation 70.0 28.9
Community Impact 15.7 9.7
Content Distribution 64.2 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (28)

2019
[Children's non-carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals exposure to residential indoor dust around an e-waste dismantling area in South China].
Vol. 53 , No. 4 , pp. 360-364
667 views DOI Abstract
2020
[A study on the correlation of phthalate metabolites in umbilical cord blood of 161 newborns with birth indicators in Beijing]
Vol. 54 , No. 7 , pp. -
614 views Abstract
2016
seasonal affective disorder, winter type: current insights and treatment options
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 317-327
507 views Abstract
2019
[The self-injury status and relevant factors of disabled children and adolescents in Beijing].
Vol. 53 , No. 9 , pp. 941-943
403 views DOI Abstract
2020
[Current status and prospects of population exposure assessment of nanomaterials consumer products]
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. -
393 views Abstract
2018
[Risk of HIV infection and its factors among men who have sex with men: a geosocial networking application-based survey in Beijing of China, 2017].
Vol. 52 , No. 12 , pp. 1220-1224
385 views DOI Abstract
2020
[Analysis of rush poppers use and related factors in men who have sex with men in Jinan and Qingdao, 2016]
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. -
363 views Abstract
2020
[The development and validation of risk prediction model for lung cancer: a systematic review].
Vol. 54 , No. 4 , pp. 430-437
315 views DOI Abstract
2020
[A study on the correlation of phthalate metabolites in umbilical cord blood of 161 newborns with birth indicators in Beijing]
Vol. 54 , No. 7 , pp. -
614 views Abstract
2020
[Current status and prospects of population exposure assessment of nanomaterials consumer products]
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. -
393 views Abstract
2020
[A systematic review of the risk of oral rotavirus vaccine and intussusception]
Vol. 54 , No. 7 , pp. -
267 views Abstract
2020
[Analysis of rush poppers use and related factors in men who have sex with men in Jinan and Qingdao, 2016]
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. -
363 views Abstract
2019
[The self-injury status and relevant factors of disabled children and adolescents in Beijing].
Vol. 53 , No. 9 , pp. 941-943
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
[A retrospective cohort study of long-term nitrogen dioxide exposure and incident hypertension].
Vol. 53 , No. 9 , pp. 919-924
231 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #21,579 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

29.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

15.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

64.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.