zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [chinese journal of preventive medicine] | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1686 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [chinese journal of preventive medicine]

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi
Abbreviated Name zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi
ISSN 0253-9624
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.pubhealth.org.cn/cn/page.asp?pageid=10.html
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (28 total)

2019
[Children's non-carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals exposure to residential indoor dust around an e-waste dismantling area in South China].
Chen, X C;Zhu, X H;Lin, B G;Li, L Z;Yu, Z L;Xiang, M D;Yu, Y J;
Vol. 53 , No. 4 , pp. 360-364
611 views DOI Abstract
2020
[A study on the correlation of phthalate metabolites in umbilical cord blood of 161 newborns with birth indicators in Beijing]
Miao HJ;Zhang L;Lai JQ;Sun L;Zhao YF;Li JG;;
Vol. 54 , No. 7 , pp. -
568 views Abstract
2020
[Using text mining to identify gap in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome related information dissemination between the official channel delivery and the needs of adolescents]
Wu HC;Shu W;Li ML;Li ZA;Hu YF;;
Vol. 54 , No. 6 , pp. -
461 views Abstract
2016
seasonal affective disorder, winter type: current insights and treatment options
;Meesters Y;Gordijn MCM
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 317-327
457 views Abstract
2020
[Safety and immunogenicity analysis of recombinant （hansenula polymorpha) hepatitis B vaccine （CpG ODN adjuvant) among adults: the preliminary results of phase I clinical trial]
Liang ZZ;Shao Y;Wang SY;Yan CF;Chen B;Zhang J;Chen YP;Hu XS;Lyu HK;;
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. -
362 views Abstract
2019
[The incidence of school violence and its relevant factors among senior students of rural primary schools in Guizhou and Anhui Province in 2016].
Jiang, X W;Ji, Y;He, H;Chang, C;
Vol. 53 , No. 8 , pp. 824-828
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
[The self-injury status and relevant factors of disabled children and adolescents in Beijing].
Xiayidanmu, Abudusaimaiti;Gao, Q;Yang, S P;Hu, Y F;Zhu, H P;
Vol. 53 , No. 9 , pp. 941-943
344 views DOI Abstract
2018
[Risk of HIV infection and its factors among men who have sex with men: a geosocial networking application-based survey in Beijing of China, 2017].
Luo, Q Q;Chen, Z H;Ma, Y;Mi, G D;Xu, J;Rou, K M;Wu, Z Y;
Vol. 52 , No. 12 , pp. 1220-1224
341 views DOI Abstract
2020
[Current status and prospects of population exposure assessment of nanomaterials consumer products]
Zou XX;Zhang B;Liu LH;Wang HJ;Wu JQ;Yang QY;Zhang XJ;Liu ZQ;;
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. -
336 views Abstract
2020
[Analysis of rush poppers use and related factors in men who have sex with men in Jinan and Qingdao, 2016]
Huang PX;Duan Q;Liao MZ;Wang GY;Zhu XY;Yang XG;Hao LZ;Tao XR;Kang DM;;
Vol. 54 , No. 8 , pp. -
317 views Abstract
View All 28 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.