journal of anthropological archaeology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#949 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of anthropological archaeology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim ahci soc
Short Name journal of anthropological archaeology
Abbreviated Name
ISSN 0278-4165
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622852/description
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (47 total)

2020
A niche of their own: population dynamics, niche diversification, and biopolitics in the recent biocultural evolution of hunter-gatherers
Stutz, A.
Vol. 57 , pp. 0-0
295 views DOI
2019
Meat outside the freezer: Drying, smoking, salting and sealing meat in fat at an Epipalaeolithic megasite in eastern Jordan
Spyrou A.
Vol. 54 , pp. 84-101
292 views DOI
2019
Water, dust, and agro-pastoralism: Modeling socio-ecological co-evolution of landscapes, farming, and human society in southeast Kazakhstan during the mid to late Holocene
Ullah, I.
Vol. 55 , pp. 0-0
283 views DOI
2007
o desenvolvimento territorial para avaliação de políticas públicas exemplo do assentamento de uma fazenda em tocantins (brasil)
;José Carlos de Miranda
Vol. XLII , No. 84 , pp. 119-124
282 views Abstract
1993
catástrofes naturais em debate
;Maria Luísa Rodrigues
Vol. XXVIII , No. 55-56 , pp. 245-247
267 views
1998
minorias étnicas e segregação nas cidades - uma aproximação ao caso de lisboa, no contexto da europa mediterrânica
;Jorge Macaísta Malheiros
Vol. XXXIII , No. 66 , pp. 91-118
262 views Abstract
1987
uma tese de palinologia sobre o pliocénico de portugal
;Maria Eugénia Moreira
Vol. XXII , No. 43 , pp. 202-204
260 views
2005
cidade de nampula: a rainha do norte de moçambique
;Manuel Mendes de Araújo
Vol. XL , No. 79 , pp. 209-222
258 views Abstract
2002
as recentes alterações no currículo obrigatório de geografia em portugal (1989-2001)
;Maria Fernanda Alegria
Vol. XXXVII , No. 73 , pp. 81-98
252 views Abstract
2019
Corrigendum to “Cemeteries on a moving frontier: Mortuary practices and the spread of pastoralism from the Sahara into eastern Africa” [J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 51 (2018) 187–205](S027841651730123X)(10.1016/j.jaa.2018.08.001)
Sawchuk, E.
Vol. 53 , pp. 342-343
243 views DOI
View All 47 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.