Molecular and biochemical parasitology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#298 / 33,853
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 16 hours ago

Molecular and biochemical parasitology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Mol Biochem Parasitol
Abbreviated Name mol biochem parasitol
ISSN 1872-9428
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (65 total)

2019
A novel GCN5b lysine acetyltransferase complex associates with distinct transcription factors in the protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii.
Harris, Michael T;Jeffers, Victoria;Martynowicz, Jennifer;True, Jason D;Mosley, Amber L;Sullivan, William J;
Vol. 232 , pp. 111203
290 views DOI Abstract
2020
The recognition of proteasomal receptors by Plasmodium falciparum DSK2.
Gupta, Ishita;Khan, Sameena;
, pp. 111266
281 views DOI Abstract
2015
el papel activo de los hombres contra la violencia de género (men's active role against gender-based violence)
;Mikel Otxotorena Fernandez
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 669-683
263 views Abstract
2013
towards a new horizon: in search of a renewing socio-juridical imaginary
;Anna Grear
Vol. 3 , No. 5 , pp. 966-990
259 views Abstract
2015
who wants a fat child?: care for obese children in weight obsessed societies
;W.A. Bogart
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 8-28
253 views Abstract
2018
Expression, purification and characterization of two leucine aminopeptidases of the blood fluke, Schistosoma mansoni.
Maggioli, Gabriela;Rinaldi, Gabriel;Giaudrone, Ines;Berasain, Patricia;Tort, José F;Brindley, Paul J;Carmona, Carlos;
Vol. 219 , pp. 17-23
242 views DOI Abstract
2015
los estereotipos de género en los procedimientos judiciales por violencia de género: el papel del comité cedaw en la eliminación de la discriminación y de la estereotipación (gender stereotypes in gender-based violence court proceedings: the cedaw committ
;Gema Fernández Rodríguez de Liévana
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 498-519
241 views Abstract
2011
reform at the top: what's next for the wto? a second life? a socio-political analysis
;Daniel Drache
Vol. 1 , No. 4 , pp. 2-
238 views Abstract
2019
An enigmatic catalase of Blastocrithidia.
Bianchi, Claretta;Yu Kostygov, Alexei;Kraeva, Natalya;Záhonová, Kristína;Horáková, Eva;Sobotka, Roman;Lukeš, Julius;Yurchenko, Vyacheslav;
, pp. 111199
236 views DOI Abstract
2017
conceptions of freedom in the use of the open public space: the foruen enparantza in oñati as an illustration
;Leopoldo Cruz Balbuena
Vol. 7 , No. 6 , pp. 1160-1198
236 views Abstract
View All 65 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.