Indexed in Journament

Molecular and biochemical parasitology

ISSN 1872-9428· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #16,546 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
65 Articles
Scores higher than 43.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Mol Biochem Parasitol
Abbreviated Name mol biochem parasitol
ISSN 1872-9428
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/molecular-and-biochemical-parasitology

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 8.6
Content Distribution 66.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity — 28.2
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 8.6 11.5
Content Distribution 66.9 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (65)

2020
The recognition of proteasomal receptors by Plasmodium falciparum DSK2.
Gupta, Ishita;Khan, Sameena;
, pp. 111266
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
A novel GCN5b lysine acetyltransferase complex associates with distinct transcription factors in the protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii.
Harris, Michael T;Jeffers, Victoria;Martynowicz, Jennifer;True, Jason D;Mosley, Amber L;Sullivan, William J;
Vol. 232 , pp. 111203
347 views DOI Abstract
2013
towards a new horizon: in search of a renewing socio-juridical imaginary
;Anna Grear
Vol. 3 , No. 5 , pp. 966-990
341 views Abstract
2015
el papel activo de los hombres contra la violencia de género (men's active role against gender-based violence)
;Mikel Otxotorena Fernandez
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 669-683
340 views Abstract
2015
who wants a fat child?: care for obese children in weight obsessed societies
;W.A. Bogart
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 8-28
334 views Abstract
2015
welfare cuts and insecurity under the rule of austerity: the impact of the crisis on portuguese social services
;Pedro Hespanha;Silvia Portugal
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 1110-1132
331 views Abstract
2015
los estereotipos de género en los procedimientos judiciales por violencia de género: el papel del comité cedaw en la eliminación de la discriminación y de la estereotipación (gender stereotypes in gender-based violence court proceedings: the cedaw committ
;Gema Fernández Rodríguez de Liévana
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 498-519
316 views Abstract
2011
reform at the top: what's next for the wto? a second life? a socio-political analysis
;Daniel Drache
Vol. 1 , No. 4 , pp. 2-
313 views Abstract
2017
conceptions of freedom in the use of the open public space: the foruen enparantza in oñati as an illustration
;Leopoldo Cruz Balbuena
Vol. 7 , No. 6 , pp. 1160-1198
308 views Abstract
2015
“bread and roses”: economic justice and constitutional rights
;Colleen Sheppard
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 237-257
304 views Abstract
2022
Characteristics of γδTCR on myeloid cells from C57BL/6 mice with Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis infection.
Chen, Dianhui;Mo, Feng;Liu, Meiling;Ma, Yongjing;Liu, Lin;Xing, Junmin;Shi, Feihu;Xie, Anqi;Xie, Hongyan;Pan, Xingfei;Wang, Xinhua;Huang, Jun;
, pp. 111540
177 views DOI Abstract
2020
The recognition of proteasomal receptors by Plasmodium falciparum DSK2.
Gupta, Ishita;Khan, Sameena;
, pp. 111266
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
A novel GCN5b lysine acetyltransferase complex associates with distinct transcription factors in the protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii.
Harris, Michael T;Jeffers, Victoria;Martynowicz, Jennifer;True, Jason D;Mosley, Amber L;Sullivan, William J;
Vol. 232 , pp. 111203
347 views DOI Abstract
2019
An enigmatic catalase of Blastocrithidia.
Bianchi, Claretta;Yu Kostygov, Alexei;Kraeva, Natalya;Záhonová, Kristína;Horáková, Eva;Sobotka, Roman;Lukeš, Julius;Yurchenko, Vyacheslav;
, pp. 111199
275 views DOI Abstract
2018
the criminalisation and imprisonment of migrant victims of trafficking
;Liz Hales
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 50-70
206 views Abstract
2018
Expression, purification and characterization of two leucine aminopeptidases of the blood fluke, Schistosoma mansoni.
Maggioli, Gabriela;Rinaldi, Gabriel;Giaudrone, Ines;Berasain, Patricia;Tort, José F;Brindley, Paul J;Carmona, Carlos;
Vol. 219 , pp. 17-23
303 views DOI Abstract
2017
the effects of the shortage of judges in israel
;Limor Zer-Gutman
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 809-824
203 views Abstract
2017
the (non)violence of private ordering
;Prashan Ranasinghe
Vol. 7 , No. 7 , pp. 1532-1556
20 views Abstract
2017
women judges and women’s rights in pakistan
;Livia Holden
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 752-769
118 views Abstract
2017
conceptions of freedom in the use of the open public space: the foruen enparantza in oñati as an illustration
;Leopoldo Cruz Balbuena
Vol. 7 , No. 6 , pp. 1160-1198
308 views Abstract
Journament Score
33.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #16,546 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.