Appetite | Journament

Journal Ranking

#693 / 33,947
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

Appetite

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Appetite
Abbreviated Name appetite
ISSN 1095-8304
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/appetite
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (72 total)

2019
What's in a name? Consumer perceptions of in vitro meat under different names
Bryant C.
Vol. 137 , pp. 104-113
464 views DOI
2019
A cross-disciplinary mixed-method approach to understand how food retail environment transformations influence food choice and intake among the urban poor: Experiences from Vietnam.
Wertheim-Heck, Sigrid C O;Raneri, Jessica E;
Vol. 142 , pp. 104370
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effects of bariatric surgery on psychological aspects of eating behaviour and food intake in humans.
Bryant, E J;Malik, M S;Whitford-Bartle, T;Waters, G M;
, pp. 104575
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
Social, temporal and situational influences on meat consumption in the UK population
Horgan G.
Vol. 138 , pp. 1-9
371 views DOI
2016
Pregnant in a foreign city: A qualitative analysis of diet and nutrition for cross-border migrant women in Cape Town, South Africa.
Hunter-Adams, Jo;Rother, Hanna-Andrea;
Vol. 103 , pp. 403-410
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Consumers' purchase decisions for products with nutrition and health claims: What role do product category and gaze duration on claims play?
Steinhauser, Johann;Janssen, Meike;Hamm, Ulrich;
Vol. 141 , pp. 104337
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sex differences in the relationships among weight stigma, depression, and binge eating
Wellman, J.
Vol. 133 , pp. 166-173
356 views DOI
2013
Real-life setting in data collection. The role of nutrition knowledge whilst selecting food products for weight management purposes in a supermarket environment.
Saarela, Anna-Maria;Lapveteläinen, Anja T;Mykkänen, Hannu M;Kantanen, Teuvo T;Rissanen, Riitta L;
Vol. 71 , pp. 196-208
356 views DOI Abstract
2017
Looking is buying. How visual attention and choice are affected by consumer preferences and properties of the supermarket shelf.
Gidlöf, Kerstin;Anikin, Andrey;Lingonblad, Martin;Wallin, Annika;
Vol. 116 , pp. 29-38
347 views DOI Abstract
2011
Influence of ethnocentrism and neo-phobia on ethnic food consumption in Spain.
Camarena, Dena M;Sanjuán, Ana I;Philippidis, George;
Vol. 57 , No. 1 , pp. 121-30
342 views DOI Abstract
View All 72 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.