gastric cancer : official journal of the international gastric cancer association and the japanese gastric cancer association | Journament

Journal Ranking

#598 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

gastric cancer : official journal of the international gastric cancer association and the japanese gastric cancer association

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name gastric cancer : official journal of the international gastric cancer association and the japanese gastric cancer association
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/10120
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (40 total)

2019
Frequency of CDH1 germline variants and contribution of dietary habits in early age onset gastric cancer patients in Brazil.
Guindalini, Rodrigo Santa Cruz;Cormedi, Marina Cândido Visontai;Maistro, Simone;Pasini, Fátima Solange;Branas, Priscila Cristina Abduch Adas;Dos Santos, Liliane;de Lima Pereira, Gláucia Fernanda;de Bock, Geertruida Hendrika;Saccaro, Daniela Marques;Katayama, Maria Lucia Hirata;Faraj, Sheila Friedrich;Safatle-Ribeiro, Adriana;Ribeiro Junior, Ulysses;Diz, Maria Del Pilar Estevez;de Gouvêa, Ana Carolina Ribeiro Chaves;Chammas, Roger;Folgueira, Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike;
368 views DOI Abstract
2009
esoc knowledge management roadmap
;Roberta Mugellesi Dow;Mario Merri;Adam Williams;Michael Mckay;Markus Kirsch;Marco A. Garcia Matatoros;Siegmar Pallaschke
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 61-65
306 views Abstract
2017
logic as a key to interdisciplinary integration for students in the mathematical sciences
;Thomas Marlowe;Fr. Joseph R. Laracy
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 63-71
304 views Abstract
2012
architecture degree project: use of 3d technology, models and augmented reality experience with visually impaired users
;Isidro Navarro Delgado;David Fonseca
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 57-62
285 views Abstract
2012
information risk management: qualitative or quantitative? cross industry lessons from medical and financial fields
;Upasna Saluja;Norbik Bashah Idris
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 54-59
283 views Abstract
2011
using saml for attribution, delegation and least privilege
;Coimbatore S. Chandersekaran;William R. Simpson
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 1-7
283 views Abstract
2016
aim: an integrated approach to organizational improvement
;Ronald A. Styron, Jr.
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1-4
278 views Abstract
2012
a real-time performance analysis model for cryptographic protocols
;Amos Olagunju;Jake Soenneker
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. 68-75
275 views Abstract
2014
using an interdisciplinary course to teach intercultural communication: helping students and faculty bridge disciplinary divides
;Madelyn Flammia;Houman Sadri
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 21-26
272 views Abstract
2014
visibility of open acces repositories of digital university libraries: a case study of the eu visegrád group
;Erzsebet Dani
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 34-40
268 views Abstract
View All 40 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.