Nutrition journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1667 / 33,957
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Nutrition journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name Nutr J
Abbreviated Name nutr j
ISSN 1475-2891
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/12937
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2017
The effect of replacing saturated fat with mostly n-6 polyunsaturated fat on coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Hamley, Steven;
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 1-16
582 views Abstract
2019
Gender inequalities in diet quality and their socioeconomic patterning in a nutrition transition context in the Middle East and North Africa: a cross-sectional study in Tunisia.
Abassi, Mohamed Mehdi;Sassi, Sonia;El Ati, Jalila;Ben Gharbia, Houda;Delpeuch, Francis;Traissac, Pierre;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 18
423 views DOI Abstract
2018
The extent and nature of supermarket own brand foods in Australia: Study protocol for describing the contribution of selected products to the healthfulness of food environments 11 Medical and Health Sciences 1111 Nutrition and Dietetics 11 Medical and Health Sciences 1117 Public Health and Health Services
Pulker, C.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
412 views DOI
2020
Associations between dietary patterns and blood pressure in a sample of Australian adults.
Margerison, Claire;Riddell, Lynnette J;McNaughton, Sarah A;Nowson, Caryl A;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 5
362 views DOI Abstract
2018
Vegetarian-style dietary pattern during adolescence has long-term positive impact on bone from adolescence to young adulthood: a longitudinal study.
Movassagh, Elham Z;Baxter-Jones, Adam D G;Kontulainen, Saija;Whiting, Susan;Szafron, Michael;Vatanparast, Hassan;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 36
353 views DOI Abstract
2020
Optimism is associated with diet quality, food group consumption and snacking behavior in a general population.
Ait-Hadad, Wassila;Bénard, Marc;Shankland, Rebecca;Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle;Robert, Margaux;Touvier, Mathilde;Hercberg, Serge;Buscail, Camille;Péneau, Sandrine;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 6
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association between micronutrient deficiency and acute respiratory infections in healthy adults: a systematic review of observational studies.
Wang, Min Xian;Koh, Jiayun;Pang, Junxiong;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 80
331 views DOI Abstract
2018
World-wide research architecture of vitamin D research: density-equalizing mapping studies and socio-economic analysis
Brüggmann, Dörthe;Alafi, Annahita;Jaque, Jenny;Klingelhöfer, Doris;Bendels, Michael H.;Ohlendorf, Daniela;Quarcoo, David;Louwen, Frank;Ingles, Sue A.;Wanke, Eileen M.;Groneberg, David A.;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
318 views Abstract
2020
The use of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v (DSM 9843) in cancer patients receiving home enteral nutrition - study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial.
Kaźmierczak-Siedlecka, Karolina;Folwarski, Marcin;Skonieczna-Żydecka, Karolina;Ruszkowski, Jakub;Makarewicz, Wojciech;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 98
303 views DOI Abstract
2005
oceanographic conditions west of the baja california coast, 2002–2003: a weak el niño and subarctic water enhancement
;
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. -
204 views Abstract
View All 13 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.