journal of polymer materials | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1270 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

journal of polymer materials

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name journal of polymer materials
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (33 total)

2017
Physico-chemical & biological properties of starch nanocrystals & orange oil incorporated chitosan film
Hari N.
Vol. 34 , pp. 261-274
362 views
2012
using web 2.0 technologies for collaborative learning in distance education—case studies from an  australian university
;David Lloyd;William Boyd;Kristin den Exter;Stephen Rowe
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 216-237
270 views DOI Abstract
2016
autonomic semantic-based context-aware platform for mobile applications in pervasive environments
;Adel Alti;Abderrahim Lakehal;Sébastien Laborie;Philippe Roose
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 48-
258 views DOI Abstract
2015
inefficiency of ids static anomaly detectors in real-world networks
;Edward Guillen;Jeisson Sánchez;Rafael Paez
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 94-109
257 views DOI Abstract
2013
semantic and time-dependent expertise profiling models in community-driven knowledge curation platforms
;Jane Hunter;Hasti Ziaimatin;Tudor Groza
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 490-514
251 views DOI Abstract
2017
construction management risk system (cmrs) for construction management (cm) firms
;Kyungmo Park;Sanghyo Lee;Yonghan Ahn
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 5-
244 views DOI Abstract
2016
instagram and whatsapp in health and healthcare: an overview
;Maged N. Kamel Boulos;Dean M. Giustini;Steve Wheeler
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 37-
244 views DOI Abstract
2014
from raw data to meaningful information: a representational approach to cadastral databases in relation to urban planning
;Francesc Valls Dalmau;Pilar Garcia-Almirall;Ernest Redondo Domínguez;David Fonseca Escudero
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 612-639
244 views DOI Abstract
2016
data-enabled design for social change: two case studies
;Patrizia Marti;Carl Megens;Caroline Hummels
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 46-
238 views DOI Abstract
2016
using financial instruments to transfer the information security risks
;Pankaj Pandey;Einar Snekkenes
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 20-
236 views DOI Abstract
View All 33 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.