postepy higieny i medycyny doswiadczalnej (online) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6228 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 месяц назад

postepy higieny i medycyny doswiadczalnej (online)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Индексации
Краткое название postepy higieny i medycyny doswiadczalnej (online)
Сокращённое название
ISSN
Цели и охват
URL
Инструкции для авторов

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (33 total)

2006
[Prolactin in connective tissue diseases]
Parada-Turska J;Targońska-Stepniak B;Majdan M;;
Vol. 60 , pp. -
519 views Abstract
2009
a multisignal detection of hazardous materials for homeland security
;Alamaniotis Miltiadis;Terrill Sean;Perry John;Gao Rong;Tsoukalas Lefteri;Jevremović Tatjana
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 46-55
315 views DOI Abstract
2017
Alzheimer's disease against peptides products of enzymatic cleavage APP protein: Biological, pathobiological and physico-chemical properties of fibrillating peptides
Marszałek M.
Vol. 71 , pp. 398-410
297 views
2016
factors influencing u(vi) adsorption onto soil from a candidate very low level radioactive waste disposal site in china
;Zuo Rui;Liu Li;Jiang Xiaoyan;Guan Xin;Teng Yanguo;Ding Fei;Yang Jie;Wang Jinsheng
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 268-276
265 views DOI Abstract
2016
natural radionuclides in soil profiles surrounding the largest coal-fired power plant in serbia
;Tanić Milan N.;Janković-Mandić Ljiljana J.;Gajić Boško A.;Daković Marko Z.;Dragović Snežana D.;Bačić Goran G.
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 247-259
262 views DOI Abstract
2004
electrochemical etching processes for the detection of neutrons and radon-decay products
;Tommasino Luigi
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 12-19
261 views DOI Abstract
2013
using augmented-reality and mobile three-dimensional graphics techniques in relief work on radiological disaster sites
;Tsai Ming-Kuan;Yau Nie-Jia
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 332-340
255 views DOI Abstract
2003
monte carlo with fuel burnup method for the enhs benchmark calculations
;Milošević Miodrag 1;Greenspan Ehud;Vujić Jasmina Lj.
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 3-11
255 views DOI Abstract
2016
betavoltaic performance under extreme temperatures
;Adams Tom;Revankar Shripad T.;Cabauy Peter;Elkind Bret;Cheu Darrell
Vol. 31 , No. 4 , pp. 356-360
242 views DOI Abstract
2017
the hybrid model for sampling multiple elastic scattering angular deflections based on goudsmit-saunderson theory
;Wasaye Muhammad Abdul;Wang Hui;Zheng Huaqing;Long Pengcheng;Naeem Hamza
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 229-235
237 views DOI Abstract
View All 33 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.