Indexed in Journament

postepy higieny i medycyny doswiadczalnej (online)

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,194 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
33 Articles
Scores higher than 68.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name postepy higieny i medycyny doswiadczalnej (online)

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 67.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for postepy higieny i medycyny doswiadczalnej (online)
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 2.9 7.8
Content Distribution 67.8 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (33)

2006
[Prolactin in connective tissue diseases]
Vol. 60 , pp. -
573 views Abstract
2009
a multisignal detection of hazardous materials for homeland security
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 46-55
342 views DOI Abstract
2013
using augmented-reality and mobile three-dimensional graphics techniques in relief work on radiological disaster sites
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 332-340
323 views DOI Abstract
2016
factors influencing u(vi) adsorption onto soil from a candidate very low level radioactive waste disposal site in china
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 268-276
308 views DOI Abstract
2016
natural radionuclides in soil profiles surrounding the largest coal-fired power plant in serbia
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 247-259
297 views DOI Abstract
2004
electrochemical etching processes for the detection of neutrons and radon-decay products
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 12-19
291 views DOI Abstract
2017
the hybrid model for sampling multiple elastic scattering angular deflections based on goudsmit-saunderson theory
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 229-235
282 views DOI Abstract
2016
betavoltaic performance under extreme temperatures
Vol. 31 , No. 4 , pp. 356-360
281 views DOI Abstract
2003
monte carlo with fuel burnup method for the enhs benchmark calculations
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 3-11
278 views DOI Abstract
2017
the determination of the mean value of the non-homogenous background radiation and the measurement uncertainty using welch-satterthwaite equation
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 371-374
158 views DOI Abstract
2017
investigation of the production of cobalt-60 via particle accelerator
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 327-333
210 views DOI Abstract
2017
the hybrid model for sampling multiple elastic scattering angular deflections based on goudsmit-saunderson theory
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 229-235
282 views DOI Abstract
2017
radiological, geochemical, and mineralogical characterization of natural stones used in turkey
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 267-274
212 views DOI Abstract
2016
linear stability analysis of a nuclear reactor using the lumped model
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 218-227
122 views DOI Abstract
2016
factors influencing u(vi) adsorption onto soil from a candidate very low level radioactive waste disposal site in china
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 268-276
308 views DOI Abstract
2016
natural radionuclides in soil profiles surrounding the largest coal-fired power plant in serbia
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 247-259
297 views DOI Abstract
2016
natural radioactivity level in materials used for medieval vaulting in the territory of the central balkan region
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 184-189
228 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,194 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.