Amino acids | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1247 / 33,947
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

Amino acids

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Amino Acids
Abbreviated Name amino acids
ISSN 1438-2199
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/726
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (23 total)

2017
Retro analog concept: comparative study on physico-chemical and biological properties of selected antimicrobial peptides
Neubauer D.
Vol. 49 , pp. 1755-1771
394 views DOI
2018
Leucine/Pd-loaded (5,5) single-walled carbon nanotube matrix as a novel nanobiosensors for in silico detection of protein.
Yoosefian, Mehdi;Etminan, Nazanin;
Vol. 50 , No. 6 , pp. 653-661
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
The investigation of structure-activity relationship of polyamine-targeted synthetic compounds from different chemical groups.
Syatkin, Sergey P;Neborak, Ekaterina V;Khlebnikov, Andrei I;Komarova, Marina V;Shevkun, Natalia A;Kravtsov, Eduard G;Blagonravov, Mikhail L;Agostinelli, Enzo;
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
Branched-chain amino acids do not improve muscle recovery from resistance exercise in untrained young adults.
Estoche, José Maria;Jacinto, Jeferson Lucas;Roveratti, Mirela Casonato;Gabardo, Juliano Moro;Buzzachera, Cosme Franklim;de Oliveira, Erick Prado;Ribeiro, Alex Silva;da Silva, Rubens Alexandre;Aguiar, Andreo Fernando;
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
The application of HPLC/MS analysis with a multi-enzyme digest strategy to characterize different interferon product variants produced from Pichia pastoris.
Wang, Yu;Liu, Di;Crowell, Laura E;Love, Kerry R;Wu, Shiaw-Lin;Hancock, William S;
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
Synthesis, protonation constants and biological activity determination of amino acid-salicylaldehyde-derived Schiff bases.
Fattuoni, Claudia;Vascellari, Sarah;Pivetta, Tiziana;
293 views DOI Abstract
2012
Oxidative stress improvement is associated with increased levels of taurine in CKD patients undergoing lipid-lowering therapy
Zinellu, A.
Vol. 43 , pp. 1499-1507
275 views DOI
2019
Discrimination power of knowledge-based potential dictated by the dominant energies in native protein structures
Mirzaie, M.
Vol. 51 , pp. 1029-1038
259 views DOI
2012
the macrophyte - floodplain habitat relationship: indicator species, diversity and dominance
;SCHMIDT-MUMM Udo;JANAUER Georg Albert;RECKENDORFER Walter
Vol. 18 , pp. 43-48
237 views DOI Abstract
2008
contribution to the assessment of ecological status in some of the lakes of the danube delta according to the european water framework directive
;DUMITRU Rodica;STARAŞ Mircea;TEODOROF Liliana;NĂSTASE Aurel;DOROFTEI Mihai;TUDOR Mihaela;TÖRÖK Liliana;IBRAM Orhan
Vol. 14 , pp. 93-98
226 views Abstract
View All 23 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.