revista virtual de quimica | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2510 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
34.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

revista virtual de quimica

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name revista virtual de quimica
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2014
the profile and treatment outcomes of sputum smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis re-treatment cases, in a district medical college of west bengal, india
;Abinash Agarwala;Kaushik Saha;Shelley Shamim;Partha Pratim Roy
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 63-67
542 views DOI Abstract
2018
Chitosan scaffolds - Physico - Chemical and biological properties for bone repair
Rolim A.
Vol. 10 , pp. 211-228
376 views DOI
2013
adverse drug reactions in tuberculosis patients due to directly observed treatment strategy therapy: experience at an outpatient clinic of a teaching hospital in the city of imphal, manipur, india
;Kumarjit Sinha;Izora Trudy R Marak;W Asoka Singh
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 50-53
329 views DOI Abstract
2013
carcinoma lung: clinical presentation, diagnosis, and its surgical management
;Farooq Ahmad Ganie;Mohd Lateef Wani;Hafeezulla Lone;Shadab Nabi Wani;Syed Abir Hussain
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 38-43
234 views DOI Abstract
2015
wegener′s granulomatosis disease mimicking pulmonary tuberculosis
;Naveen Pandhi;N C Kajal;C L Nagaraja;K Swathi;Rahul Prabhudesai
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 63-65
188 views DOI Abstract
2015
ovarian tubercular abscess mimicking ovarian carcinoma: a rare case report
;Abinash Agarwala;Aprup Dhua;Shelley Shamim;P P Roy
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 14-16
187 views DOI Abstract
2016
pulmonary arteriovenous malformation: a rare cause of hemoptysis
;Kimmin Kalyaniwala;Moses Kirubairaj Amos Jegaraj
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 71-73
182 views DOI Abstract
2013
congenital bochdalek′s hernia in a 18-year-old boy
;Supriya Sarkar;Arnab Maji;Kaushik Saha;Debraj Jash
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 62-64
182 views DOI Abstract
2016
linezolid induced pancytopenia in a patient of extensively drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis: an unusual outcome
;Rajiv Garg;Ashwini Kumar Mishra;RamAwadh Singh Kushwaha;Anubhuti Singh
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 21-23
174 views DOI Abstract
2017
saber-sheath trachea
;Sibes K Das;Anirban Das;Soumya Sarkar;Himadri Samanta
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 60-61
140 views DOI
View All 14 Articles
34
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.