Folia microbiologica | Journament

Journal Ranking

#425 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

Folia microbiologica

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name Folia Microbiol (Praha)
Abbreviated Name folia microbiol (praha)
ISSN 1874-9356
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/12223
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2019
Antimicrobial activity and bioactive profiling of heterocytous cyanobacterial strains using MS/MS-based molecular networking.
Saurav, Kumar;Macho, Markéta;Kust, Andreja;Delawská, Kateřina;Hájek, Jan;Hrouzek, Pavel;
Vol. 64 , No. 5 , pp. 645-654
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Purification and characterization of pediocin from probiotic Pediococcus pentosaceus GS4, MTCC 12683.
Ghosh, Budhaditya;Sukumar, Gowri;Ghosh, Asit Ranjan;
334 views DOI Abstract
2012
learning lessons from the past: legal issues arising from ireland's child abuse reports
;Ursula Kilkelly
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 8-24
312 views Abstract
2005
Antimicrobial activity of ZnII, CdII, and HgII complexes of 1,2-bis-[2-(5-R)-1H-benzimidazolyl]-1,2-ethanediols and 1,4-bis-[2-(5-R)-1H-benzimidazolyl]-1,2,3,4-butanetetraols.
Tavman, A;Birteksöz, S;Otük, G;
Vol. 50 , No. 6 , pp. 473-8
290 views Abstract
2002
Antimicrobial activity of FeIII, CuII, AgI, ZnII and HgII complexes of 2-(2-hydroxy-5-bromo/nitro-phenyl)-1H- and 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-5-methyl/chloro/nitro-1H-benzimidazoles.
Ulküseven, B;Tavman, A;Otük, G;Birteksöz, S;
Vol. 47 , No. 5 , pp. 481-7
282 views Abstract
2019
Multicellular growth of the Basidiomycota phytopathogen fungus Sporisorium reilianum induced by acid conditions.
Martínez-Soto, Domingo;Velez-Haro, John Martin;León-Ramírez, Claudia Geraldine;Galán-Vásquez, Edgardo;Chávez-Munguía, Bibiana;Ruiz-Herrera, José;
264 views DOI Abstract
2019
The emergence of mcr-1-mediated colistin-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in domestic and imported turkey meat in the Czech Republic 2017-2018.
Gelbicova, Tereza;Kolackova, Ivana;Krutova, Marcela;Karpiskova, Renata;
, pp. 0-0
259 views DOI Abstract
2003
Antimicrobial activity of some 2- and 3-pyridinyl-1H-benzimidazoles and their FeIII, CuII, ZnII, and AgI complexes.
Tavman, A;Ulküseven, B;Birteksöz, S;Otük, G;
Vol. 48 , No. 4 , pp. 479-83
256 views Abstract
1983
Antimicrobial properties of some plant extracts against bacteria.
Mehta, P;Chopra, S;Mehta, A;
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 467-9
247 views Abstract
2009
editorial: in praise of repositories and open access
;Kevin Lalor
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 4-5
237 views
View All 11 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.