international journal of environmental research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4234 / 33,987
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
29
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 ay önce

international journal of environmental research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indekslemeler
Kisa Ad international journal of environmental research
Kisaltilmis Ad
ISSN
Amac ve Kapsam
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/41742
Yazar Talimatlari

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2010
Adsorption of fluoride from water by Al3+ and Fe3+ pretreated natural Iranian zeolites
Rahmani, A;Nouri, J;Kamal Ghadiri, S;Mahvi, AH;ZareM, R
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 607-614
279 views
2013
topical effects of n-acetyl-l-hydroxyproline on ceramide synthesis and alleviation of pruritus
;Hashizume E;Nakano T;Kamimura A;Morishita K
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 43-49
261 views Abstract
2018
in vivo validation of the multicomponent powder (vitachelox®) against the deposition of polluting ions
;Giacomelli L;Togni S;Meneghin M;Eggenhöffner R;Maramaldi G
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 109-113
249 views Abstract
2015
facial primer provides immediate and long-term improvements in mild-to-moderate facial hyperpigmentation and fine lines associated with photoaging
;Roberts WE;Jiang LI;Herndon Jr JH
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 471-477
223 views Abstract
2018
adult-onset acne: prevalence, impact, and management challenges
;Rocha MA;Bagatin E
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 59-69
209 views Abstract
2013
skin-protective effects of a zinc oxide-functionalized textile and its relevance for atopic dermatitis
;Wieg;C;Hipler U-C;Boldt S;Strehle J;Wollina U
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 115-121
167 views Abstract
2012
clinical utility of clocortolone pivalate for the treatment of corticosteroid-responsive skin disorders: a systematic review
;Singh S;Mann BK
Vol. 2012 , No. default , pp. 61-68
166 views Abstract
2015
non-melanoma skin cancer in renal transplant recipients: a study in a brazilian reference center
;Gonçalves CP;Trope BM;Ramos-e-Silva M
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 339-344
160 views Abstract
2009
an update on the management of acne vulgaris
;Jonette Keri;Michael Shiman
Vol. 2009 , No. default , pp. 105-110
158 views Abstract
2014
a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating dermytol® cream for the treatment of actinic keratoses
;Evans M;Kalman D;Alvarez P;Paquet M;Guthrie N
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 215-224
131 views Abstract
View All 11 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
29
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

28.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.