Indexed in Journament

environmental quality management

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,665 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
20 Articles
Scores higher than 15.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name environmental quality management

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 61.5
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 63.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for environmental quality management
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.3
Accessibility 18.3
Timeliness 0.0 12.6
Diversity 5.6 27.3
Innovation 61.5 28.9
Community Impact 2.9 9.7
Content Distribution 63.4 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (20)

2013
cutaneous leishmaniasis in suspected patients referred to the center for research and training in skin diseases and leprosy, tehran, iran from 2008 to 2011
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 430-436
459 views Abstract
2012
hair contamination of sheepdog and pet dogs with toxocara canis eggs
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 110-115
452 views Abstract
2012
il-23 and il-27 levels in macrophages collected from peripheral blood of patients with healing vs non-healing form of cutaneous leishmaniasis
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 18-25
446 views Abstract
2013
gene regulation of pteridine reductase 1 in leishmania promastigotes and amastigotes using a full-length antisense construct
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 190-196
370 views Abstract
2013
echinococcosis/hydatidosis in ilam province, western iran
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 417-422
330 views Abstract
2012
prevalence of schistosoma intercalatum and s. haematobium infection among primary schoolchildren in capital areas of democratic republic of são tomé and príncipe, west africa
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 67-72
310 views Abstract
2008
distribution of parasitic cestod
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 26-33
299 views Abstract
2010
prevalence of giardia duodenalis infection in household cats of ahvaz district, south-west of iran
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 27-37
294 views Abstract
2019
Green marketing mix: A case study of Brazilian retail enterprises
Vol. 28 , pp. 111-116
223 views DOI
2013
cutaneous leishmaniasis in suspected patients referred to the center for research and training in skin diseases and leprosy, tehran, iran from 2008 to 2011
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 430-436
459 views Abstract
2013
plagiorchis muris (tanabe, 1922) in rattus norvegicus in iran
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 486-490
202 views Abstract
2013
echinococcosis/hydatidosis in ilam province, western iran
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 417-422
330 views Abstract
2013
development of 116 kda fraction for detecting experimental toxoplasma gondii infections in mice
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 441-448
263 views Abstract
2013
gene regulation of pteridine reductase 1 in leishmania promastigotes and amastigotes using a full-length antisense construct
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 190-196
370 views Abstract
2012
prevalence of schistosoma intercalatum and s. haematobium infection among primary schoolchildren in capital areas of democratic republic of são tomé and príncipe, west africa
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 67-72
310 views Abstract
2012
hair contamination of sheepdog and pet dogs with toxocara canis eggs
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 110-115
452 views Abstract
2012
il-23 and il-27 levels in macrophages collected from peripheral blood of patients with healing vs non-healing form of cutaneous leishmaniasis
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 18-25
446 views Abstract
Journament Score
28.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,665 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

61.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

63.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.