plant cell and environment | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5369 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

plant cell and environment

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name plant cell and environment
Abbreviated Name
ISSN 0140-7791
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13653040
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2016
How specialized volatiles respond to chronic and short-term physiological and shock heat stress in Brassica nigra
Kask K.
Vol. 39 , pp. 2027-2042
497 views DOI
2019
Dehydration-responsive nuclear proteome landscape of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) reveals phosphorylation-mediated regulation of stress response
Barua, P.
Vol. 42 , pp. 230-244
326 views DOI
2017
Dual herbivore attack and herbivore density affect metabolic profiles of Brassica nigra leaves
Ponzio C.
Vol. 40 , pp. 1356-1367
309 views DOI
2011
efecto de la concentraciÓn del metil paratiÓn y el extracto de levadura como factores de selecciÓn de microorganismos degradadores del pesticida a partir de suelos contaminados effect of methyl parathion concentration and yeast extract as factors for selecting pesticide degrading microorganisms from polluted soils
;L. R. Botero;N. Nagles;J.C. Quintero;G. A. Peñuela
Vol. 10 , No. 19 , pp. 13-20
264 views Abstract
2014
aes depth profile and photoconductive studies of agins2 thin films prepared by co-evaporation
;C. A Arredondo;C Calderón;P Bartolo-Pérez;G Gordillo;E Romero
Vol. 13 , No. 24 , pp. 121-131
256 views Abstract
2014
la gestión de programas académicos desde la perspectiva de la gestión del conocimiento apoyada con esquemas preconceptuales
;Héctor Jairo Ortiz Pabón;Carlos Mario Zapata Jaramillo;Guillermo González Calderón
Vol. 13 , No. 25 , pp. 191-205
228 views Abstract
2007
teorÍa de decisiÓn bayesiana en los criterios de similitud utilizados en la segmentaciÓn de imÁgenes de rango bayesian decision theory in similarity criteria used in range images segmentation
;Idanis Díaz;Diana Montoya;Pierre Boulanger
Vol. 6 , No. 11 , pp. 171-179
208 views Abstract
2017
Plumbing the depths: extracellular water storage in specialized leaf structures and its functional expression in a three-domain pressure –volume relationship
Nguyen, H.
Vol. 40 , pp. 1021-1038
195 views DOI
2009
deformación permanente de materiales granulares en pavimentos flexibles: estado del conocimiento permanent strain of granular materials in flexible pavements: state of the art
;Hugo Alexánder Rondón;Fredy Reyes
Vol. 8 , No. 14 , pp. 71-94
186 views Abstract
2011
protocolo para medir la emisión de ruido generado por fuentes fijas protocol for measure noise emission from stationary sources
;Carlos Alberto Echeverri Londoño;Alice Elizabeth González Fernández
Vol. 10 , No. 18 , pp. 51-60
182 views Abstract
View All 14 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.