polymer bulletin | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2322 / 33,954
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

polymer bulletin

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name polymer bulletin
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2017
phytochemical analysis and cytotoxicity evaluation of kelussia odoratissima mozaff.
;Amir Abbas Momtazi;Omid Askari-Khorasgani;Elham Abdollahi;Hojjat Sadeghi-Aliabadi;Forough Mortazaeinezhad;Amirhossein Sahebkar
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 180-186
509 views DOI Abstract
2019
An escalation of anticorrosion and microelectrical properties of polyurethane nanocomposites from green Brassica nigra oil
Selvaraj V.
Vol. 76 , pp. 469-494
364 views DOI
2017
bee venom acupuncture reduces interleukin-6, increases interleukin-10, and induces locomotor recovery in a model of spinal cord compression
;Raquel Nascimento de Souza;Fernanda Kohn Silva;Magda Alves de Medeiros
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 204-210
345 views DOI Abstract
2017
antiplatelet aggregation activity of walnut hull extract via suppression of reactive oxygen species generation and caspase activation
;Azadeh Meshkini;Masoumeh Tahmasbi
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 193-203
306 views DOI Abstract
2019
Short silica fibre-reinforced polymethylsilsesquioxane–phenolic interpenetrating networks: exploration for use as ablative thermal protection system in aerospace
Alex, A.
Vol. 76 , pp. 3941-3956
281 views DOI
2017
sasang medical perspectives on viral immunity: a discussion of intrinsic, constitutionally related factors in disease onset and resistance
;Gary Wagman
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 1-4
268 views DOI Abstract
2018
assessing the links between anthropometrics data and akabane test results
;Valery Muzhikov;Elena Vershinina;Vadim Belenky;Ruslan Muzhikov
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 31-38
259 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of acupuncture in the treatment of restless legs syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
;Gholam Reza Raissi;Bijan Forogh;Tannaz Ahadi;Samaneh Ghahramanpoori;Pouya Ghaboussi;Simin Sajadi
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 346-350
254 views DOI Abstract
2018
In vitro and in vivo studies on devices of poly(l-co-d,l lactic acid)-co-TMC for bone repair
Motta, A.
Vol. 75 , pp. 4515-4529
253 views DOI
2016
does acupuncture alter pain-related functional connectivity of the central nervous system? a systematic review
;María Villarreal Santiago;Steve Tumilty;Aleksandra Mącznik;Ramakrishnan Mani
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 167-177
231 views DOI Abstract
View All 18 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.