Indexed in Journament

iccea 2004 - 2004 3rd international conference on computational electromagnetics and its applications, proceedings

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,636 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
26 Articles
Scores higher than 5.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name iccea 2004 - 2004 3rd international conference on computational electromagnetics and its applications, proceedings

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 16.5
Community Impact 0.7
Content Distribution 67.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for iccea 2004 - 2004 3rd international conference on computational electromagnetics and its applications, proceedings
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 16.5 31.2
Community Impact 0.7 13.4
Content Distribution 67.9 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2016
the use of heart-delivered cell culture labeled with luciferase expression for optimisation of the intramyocardial transplantation protocol
Vol. 19 , No. 4-2 , pp. 69-76
262 views DOI Abstract
2017
off-pump myocardial revascularization safety aspects in combined operations on patients with ischemic heart disease complicated by ischemic mitral regurgitation
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 48-57
233 views DOI Abstract
2015
long-term outcomes of carotid surgery in patients with metabolic disorders and multifocal atherosclerosis
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 55-60
229 views DOI Abstract
2015
diagnosis of disorders of oxygenation and thoracopulmonary restriction during mechanical ventilation of lungs from the point of view of normal and pathological physiology
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 34-38
224 views DOI Abstract
2015
outcomes of single-stage prosthetic repair of the ascending aorta and myocardial revascularization
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 61-65
221 views DOI Abstract
2015
interrelation of the heart rate turbulence with the clinical, functional and morphometric parameters among the patients with arterial hypertension
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 63-66
220 views DOI Abstract
2016
left atrial appendage closure device implantation and pulmonary vein isolation as a comprehensive treatment for atrial fibrillation
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 108-118
218 views DOI Abstract
2015
non-invasive topical diagnostics of heart arrhythmias
Vol. 18 , No. 4 , pp. 96-103
210 views DOI Abstract
2017
pleiotropic effects of levosimendan on the heart and other organs
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 14-28
84 views DOI Abstract
2017
predictors of complications when transferring postoperative cardiac patients from the intensive care unit
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 65-75
152 views DOI Abstract
2017
percutaneous coronary intervention with absorb biodegradable vascular scaffold in patients with left anterior descending artery disease
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 56-61
171 views DOI Abstract
2017
off-pump myocardial revascularization safety aspects in combined operations on patients with ischemic heart disease complicated by ischemic mitral regurgitation
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 48-57
233 views DOI Abstract
2017
Аритмолог — врач мультидисциплинарной специальности
Vol. 21 , No. 3S , pp. 20-23
12 views DOI Abstract
2016
case report: surgical treatment of a giant aneurysm of left anterior descending coronary artery
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 138-141
97 views DOI Abstract
2016
aortic root reimplantation procedure: a new milestone in aortic valve-sparing operations
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 49-57
116 views DOI Abstract
2016
left atrial appendage closure device implantation and pulmonary vein isolation as a comprehensive treatment for atrial fibrillation
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 108-118
218 views DOI Abstract
2016
Реконструктивные вмешательства на дуге аорты при хирургическом лечении аневризм и расслоений восходящего отдела аорты
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. 45-57
63 views DOI Abstract
2016
the use of heart-delivered cell culture labeled with luciferase expression for optimisation of the intramyocardial transplantation protocol
Vol. 19 , No. 4-2 , pp. 69-76
262 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
25.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,636 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

25.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

16.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

0.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.