journal of bioinformatics and computational biology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#694 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of bioinformatics and computational biology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim
Short Name journal of bioinformatics and computational biology
Abbreviated Name
ISSN 0219-7200
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.worldscinet.com/jbcb/jbcb.shtml
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2018
influence of titanium dioxide activated under visible light on survival of mold fungi
;Daria Kądziołka;Paulina Rokicka;Agata Markowska-Szczupak;Antoni W. Morawski
Vol. 69 , No. 1 , pp. 59-65
386 views DOI Abstract
2015
emotional self-control, coping with stress and psycho-physical well-being of prison officers
;Ewa Sygit-Kowalkowska;Magdalena Weber-Rajek;Krzysztof Porażyński;Aleksander Goch;Krzysztof Kraszkiewicz;Irena Bułatowicz
Vol. 66 , No. 3 , pp. 373-382
382 views DOI Abstract
2007
Prediction of transcription factor binding sites using genetical genomics methods.
von Rohr, Peter;Friberg, Markus T;Kadarmideen, Haja N;
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 773-93
356 views Abstract
2003
Recognizing complex, asymmetric functional sites in protein structures using a Bayesian scoring function.
Wei, Liping;Altman, Russ B;
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 119-38
323 views Abstract
2013
evaluation of activities aimed at preventing microbiological risks in dental practice
;Jolanta Szymańska;Jolanta Sitkowska
Vol. 64 , No. 1 , pp. 11-17
321 views DOI Abstract
2018
importance of dental care to maintain oral health of children and youth with type 1 diabetes
;Anna Kuźmiuk;Grażyna Marczuk-Kolada;Elżbieta Łuczaj-Cepowicz;Marta Obidzińska;Ewa Chorzewska;Urszula Wasilczuk;Anna Kierklo;Sławomir Dariusz Szajda
Vol. 69 , No. 1 , pp. 37-44
273 views DOI Abstract
2016
occupational diseases among farmers in poland
;Neonila Szeszenia-Dąbrowska;Beata Świątkowska;Urszula Wilczyńska
Vol. 67 , No. 2 , pp. 163-171
254 views DOI Abstract
2015
occupational exposure to biological agents intentionally used in polish enterprises
;Anna Kozajda;Irena Szadkowska-Stańczyk
Vol. 66 , No. 1 , pp. 39-47
250 views DOI Abstract
2018
adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism, and professional burnout among medical laboratory scientists
;Marlena Robakowska;Anna Tyrańska-Fobke;Maciej Walkiewicz;Małgorzata Tartas
Vol. 69 , No. 3 , pp. 253-260
248 views DOI Abstract
2013
work-related musculoskeletal injuries in physiotherapists
;Emilia Mikołajewska
Vol. 64 , No. 5 , pp. 681-687
242 views DOI Abstract
View All 15 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.