Indexed in Journament

FEMS microbiology reviews

ISSN 0168-6445· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,157 of 29,301 scored journals (34,035 indexed)
112 Articles
Scores higher than 68.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name FEMS Microbiol Rev
Abbreviated Name FEMS Microbiol Rev
ISSN 0168-6445

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 90.0
Innovation 9.0
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 36.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for FEMS microbiology reviews
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.6
Accessibility — 23.3
Timeliness 90.0 3.0
Diversity — 25.9
Innovation 9.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.1 6.7
Content Distribution 36.6 89.8
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (112)

2021
Phage satellites and their emerging applications in biotechnology.
Vol. 45 , No. 6
297 views DOI Abstract
2004
Living in a fungal world: impact of fungi on soil bacterial niche development
84 views DOI Abstract
2003
Ecology of prokaryotic viruses
81 views DOI Abstract
2013
The gut microbiota of insects – diversity in structure and function
73 views DOI Abstract
2017
Lignin degradation: microorganisms, enzymes involved, genomes analysis and evolution
70 views DOI Abstract
2017
Environmental factors influencing the development and spread of antibiotic resistance
66 views DOI Abstract
2026
Plasma-activated water: A dual-action disinfectant and wound-healing therapy for diabetes-related foot infections
62 views DOI Abstract
2017
Klebsiella pneumoniae: a major worldwide source and shuttle for antibiotic resistance
62 views DOI Abstract
2026
Biomolecular Mechanisms of Iron Oxidation in prokaryotes: a protein focused review
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Prokaryotes bridging the lipid divide
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Granuloma-Like Structures in Tuberculosis A Critical Review of Their Biology, Quantitative Behavior, and Translational Use
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Pathomycosphere: A Spatially Defined Framework in Pathogen Ecology
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Plasma-activated water: A dual-action disinfectant and wound-healing therapy for diabetes-related foot infections
62 views DOI Abstract
2026
Tat-dependent protein translocation and its evolution
25 views DOI Abstract
2026
Computational Methods in Physical Virology: A Critical Perspective across lengths and timescales
25 views DOI Abstract
2026
From Biogenesis to Host Modulation: The Expanding Biology of Oral Streptococcal Membrane Vesicles
24 views DOI Abstract
2026
Bacterial extracellular vesicles as players in biofilm dynamics and community interactions
23 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,157 of 29,301 scored
(34,035 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

9.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

36.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.