World journal of urology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1050 / 33,944
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

World journal of urology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name World J Urol
Abbreviated Name world j urol
ISSN 1433-8726
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/345
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (39 total)

2019
Awareness of European practitioners toward uncommon tropical diseases: are we prepared to deal with mass migration? Results of an international survey.
Mantica, Guglielmo;Van der Merwe, André;Terrone, Carlo;Gallo, Fabio;Zarrabi, Amir D;Vlok, Adriaan L;Ackermann, Hilgard M;Territo, Angelo;Esperto, Francesco;Olapade-Olapa, Emiola O;Riccardi, Niccolò;Bongers, Marius;Bonkat, Gernot;
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mechanical and functional validation of a perfused, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy simulation platform using a combination of 3D printing and hydrogel casting.
Melnyk, Rachel;Ezzat, Bahie;Belfast, Elizabeth;Saba, Patrick;Farooq, Shamroz;Campbell, Timothy;McAleavey, Stephen;Buckley, Mark;Ghazi, Ahmed;
398 views DOI Abstract
2020
Perioperative antithrombotic (antiplatelet and anticoagulant) therapy in urological practice: a critical assessment and summary of the clinical practice guidelines.
Dimitropoulos, Konstantinos;Omar, Muhammad Imran;Chalkias, Athanasios;Arnaoutoglou, Eleni;Douketis, James;Gravas, Stavros;
378 views DOI Abstract
2019
Does YouTube include high-quality resources for training on laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy?
Arslan, Burak;Gönültaş, Serkan;Gökmen, Ersin;Özman, Oktay;Onuk, Özkan;Yazıcı, Gökhan;Göv, Taha;Özdemir, Enver;
347 views DOI Abstract
2019
Training in robotic surgery, replicating the airline industry. How far have we come?
Collins, Justin William;Wisz, Pawel;
345 views DOI Abstract
2008
Risk stratification and prognostication of renal cell carcinoma.
Ficarra, Vincenzo;Galfano, Antonio;Novara, Giacomo;Iafrate, Massimo;Brunelli, Matteo;Secco, Silvia;Cavalleri, Stefano;Martignoni, Guido;Artibani, Walter;
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 115-25
339 views DOI Abstract
2019
3D imaging applications for robotic urologic surgery: an ESUT YAUWP review.
Checcucci, Enrico;Amparore, Daniele;Fiori, Cristian;Manfredi, Matteo;Ivano, Morra;Di Dio, Michele;Niculescu, Gabriel;Piramide, Federico;Cattaneo, Giovanni;Piazzolla, Pietro;Cacciamani, Giovanni Enrico;Autorino, Riccardo;Porpiglia, Francesco;
Vol. 38 , No. 14 , pp. 869–881
317 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cholecalciferol for the prophylaxis against recurrent urinary tract infection among patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, comparative study.
Safwat, Ahmed S;Hasanain, Ahmad;Shahat, Ahmed;AbdelRazek, Mostafa;Orabi, Hazem;Abdul Hamid, Samir K;Nafee, Amany;Bakkar, Sally;Sayed, Mohamed;
Vol. 37 , No. 7 , pp. 1347-1352
308 views DOI Abstract
2019
Non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology.
Griffin, Cora;Aydın, Abdullatif;Brunckhorst, Oliver;Raison, Nicholas;Khan, Muhammad Shamim;Dasgupta, Prokar;Ahmed, Kamran;
292 views DOI Abstract
2007
la responsabilidad social en las organizaciones (rso): análisis y comparación entre guías y normas de gestión e información
;Gaspar Berbel Giménez;Juan David Reyes Gómez;Mauricio Gómez Villegas
Vol. 17 , No. 29 , pp. 27-48
269 views Abstract
View All 39 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.