Indexed in Journament

World journal of urology

ISSN 1433-8726· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,373 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
39 Articles
Scores higher than 47.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name World J Urol
Abbreviated Name world j urol
ISSN 1433-8726
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/345

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 12.9 4.2
Content Distribution 57.8 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (39)

2019
Awareness of European practitioners toward uncommon tropical diseases: are we prepared to deal with mass migration? Results of an international survey.
Mantica, Guglielmo;Van der Merwe, André;Terrone, Carlo;Gallo, Fabio;Zarrabi, Amir D;Vlok, Adriaan L;Ackermann, Hilgard M;Territo, Angelo;Esperto, Francesco;Olapade-Olapa, Emiola O;Riccardi, Niccolò;Bongers, Marius;Bonkat, Gernot;
493 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mechanical and functional validation of a perfused, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy simulation platform using a combination of 3D printing and hydrogel casting.
Melnyk, Rachel;Ezzat, Bahie;Belfast, Elizabeth;Saba, Patrick;Farooq, Shamroz;Campbell, Timothy;McAleavey, Stephen;Buckley, Mark;Ghazi, Ahmed;
455 views DOI Abstract
2020
Perioperative antithrombotic (antiplatelet and anticoagulant) therapy in urological practice: a critical assessment and summary of the clinical practice guidelines.
Dimitropoulos, Konstantinos;Omar, Muhammad Imran;Chalkias, Athanasios;Arnaoutoglou, Eleni;Douketis, James;Gravas, Stavros;
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Training in robotic surgery, replicating the airline industry. How far have we come?
Collins, Justin William;Wisz, Pawel;
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Does YouTube include high-quality resources for training on laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy?
Arslan, Burak;Gönültaş, Serkan;Gökmen, Ersin;Özman, Oktay;Onuk, Özkan;Yazıcı, Gökhan;Göv, Taha;Özdemir, Enver;
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology.
Griffin, Cora;Aydın, Abdullatif;Brunckhorst, Oliver;Raison, Nicholas;Khan, Muhammad Shamim;Dasgupta, Prokar;Ahmed, Kamran;
379 views DOI Abstract
2008
Risk stratification and prognostication of renal cell carcinoma.
Ficarra, Vincenzo;Galfano, Antonio;Novara, Giacomo;Iafrate, Massimo;Brunelli, Matteo;Secco, Silvia;Cavalleri, Stefano;Martignoni, Guido;Artibani, Walter;
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 115-25
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
3D imaging applications for robotic urologic surgery: an ESUT YAUWP review.
Checcucci, Enrico;Amparore, Daniele;Fiori, Cristian;Manfredi, Matteo;Ivano, Morra;Di Dio, Michele;Niculescu, Gabriel;Piramide, Federico;Cattaneo, Giovanni;Piazzolla, Pietro;Cacciamani, Giovanni Enrico;Autorino, Riccardo;Porpiglia, Francesco;
Vol. 38 , No. 14 , pp. 869–881
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cholecalciferol for the prophylaxis against recurrent urinary tract infection among patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, comparative study.
Safwat, Ahmed S;Hasanain, Ahmad;Shahat, Ahmed;AbdelRazek, Mostafa;Orabi, Hazem;Abdul Hamid, Samir K;Nafee, Amany;Bakkar, Sally;Sayed, Mohamed;
Vol. 37 , No. 7 , pp. 1347-1352
360 views DOI Abstract
2007
la responsabilidad social en las organizaciones (rso): análisis y comparación entre guías y normas de gestión e información
;Gaspar Berbel Giménez;Juan David Reyes Gómez;Mauricio Gómez Villegas
Vol. 17 , No. 29 , pp. 27-48
328 views Abstract
2024
Gender inequality in genitourinary malignancies clinical trials leadership.
Alhajahjeh, Abdulrahman;Abdulelah, Ahmed A;Hmeidan, Majedah;Kakish, Diala;Sukerji, Razan;Qtaishat, Leen;Awamlh, Bashir;Dobbs, Ryan W;Al Sukhun, Sana;Laguna, Pilar;Shahait, Mohammed;
Vol. 42 , No. 1 , pp. 174
154 views DOI Abstract
2020
Perioperative antithrombotic (antiplatelet and anticoagulant) therapy in urological practice: a critical assessment and summary of the clinical practice guidelines.
Dimitropoulos, Konstantinos;Omar, Muhammad Imran;Chalkias, Athanasios;Arnaoutoglou, Eleni;Douketis, James;Gravas, Stavros;
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mechanical and functional validation of a perfused, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy simulation platform using a combination of 3D printing and hydrogel casting.
Melnyk, Rachel;Ezzat, Bahie;Belfast, Elizabeth;Saba, Patrick;Farooq, Shamroz;Campbell, Timothy;McAleavey, Stephen;Buckley, Mark;Ghazi, Ahmed;
455 views DOI Abstract
2019
Training in robotic surgery, replicating the airline industry. How far have we come?
Collins, Justin William;Wisz, Pawel;
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology.
Griffin, Cora;Aydın, Abdullatif;Brunckhorst, Oliver;Raison, Nicholas;Khan, Muhammad Shamim;Dasgupta, Prokar;Ahmed, Kamran;
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Awareness of European practitioners toward uncommon tropical diseases: are we prepared to deal with mass migration? Results of an international survey.
Mantica, Guglielmo;Van der Merwe, André;Terrone, Carlo;Gallo, Fabio;Zarrabi, Amir D;Vlok, Adriaan L;Ackermann, Hilgard M;Territo, Angelo;Esperto, Francesco;Olapade-Olapa, Emiola O;Riccardi, Niccolò;Bongers, Marius;Bonkat, Gernot;
493 views DOI Abstract
2019
Does YouTube include high-quality resources for training on laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy?
Arslan, Burak;Gönültaş, Serkan;Gökmen, Ersin;Özman, Oktay;Onuk, Özkan;Yazıcı, Gökhan;Göv, Taha;Özdemir, Enver;
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cholecalciferol for the prophylaxis against recurrent urinary tract infection among patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, comparative study.
Safwat, Ahmed S;Hasanain, Ahmad;Shahat, Ahmed;AbdelRazek, Mostafa;Orabi, Hazem;Abdul Hamid, Samir K;Nafee, Amany;Bakkar, Sally;Sayed, Mohamed;
Vol. 37 , No. 7 , pp. 1347-1352
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
3D imaging applications for robotic urologic surgery: an ESUT YAUWP review.
Checcucci, Enrico;Amparore, Daniele;Fiori, Cristian;Manfredi, Matteo;Ivano, Morra;Di Dio, Michele;Niculescu, Gabriel;Piramide, Federico;Cattaneo, Giovanni;Piazzolla, Pietro;Cacciamani, Giovanni Enrico;Autorino, Riccardo;Porpiglia, Francesco;
Vol. 38 , No. 14 , pp. 869–881
364 views DOI Abstract
2018
organizational studies in latin america. a revision on literature (2000-2014)
;Diego René González-Miranda;Carmen Alejandra Ocampo-Salazar;Mariano Gentilin
Vol. 28 , No. 67 , pp. 89-109
33 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,373 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

31.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

57.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.