nippon ganka gakkai zasshi | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4130 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

nippon ganka gakkai zasshi

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name nippon ganka gakkai zasshi
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2009
[Re-treatment guideline of ranibizumab (genetical recombination) in the maintenance phase].
Tano, Yasuo;Ohji, Masahito;Ishibashi, Tatsuro;Shiraga, Fumio;Tokoro, Takashi;Yuzawa, Mitsuko;Yoshimura, Nagahisa;
Vol. 113 , No. 11 , pp. 1098-103
325 views
1992
[Corneal endothelial cell damage in penetrating keratoplasty]
Obata H;Murao M;Miyata K;Sawa M;;
Vol. 96 , No. 3 , pp. -
275 views Abstract
2018
non-antimicrobial airway management of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis
;Ashley M. Egan;Jeremy M. Clain;Patricio Escalante
Vol. 10 , No. C , pp. 24-28
236 views DOI Abstract
1995
[Visual function analysis of diabetic retinopathy using a contrast sensitivity analyser and usefulness of nicardipine hydrochloride]
Higuchi H;Fukuda T;Ukai K;Miyata M;;
Vol. 99 , No. 8 , pp. -
231 views Abstract
2016
tuberculosis patient and family education through videography in el salvador
;John W. Wilson;Julio Garay Ramos;Francisco Castillo;Evelyn F. Castellanos;Patricio Escalante
Vol. 4 , pp. 14-20
210 views Abstract
2018
management and diagnosis of tuberculosis in solid organ transplant candidates and recipients: expert survey and updated review,
;Kelly M. Pennington;Cassie C. Kennedy;Subhash Chandra;Michael Lauzardo;Maximo O. Brito;David E. Griffith;Barbara J. Seaworth;Patricio Escalante
Vol. 11 , pp. 37-46
202 views Abstract
2018
high genetic diversity among mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in tehran, iran
;Taher Azimi;Mohammad Javad Nasiri;Samin Zamani;Ali Hashemi;Hossein Goudarzi;Abbas Ali Imani Fooladi;Mohammad Mehdi Feizabadi;Fatemeh Fallah
Vol. 11 , pp. 1-6
169 views Abstract
2017
essential and toxic metals in serum of individuals with active pulmonary tuberculosis in an endemic region
;Zahra Sepehri;Nima Mirzaei;Aliyeh Sargazi;Alireza Sargazi;Abolfazl Panahi Mishkar;Zohre Kiani;Hamid Owaysee Oskoee;Donya Arefi;Saeid Ghavami
Vol. 6 , pp. 8-13
154 views Abstract
2017
intraocular manifestations of mycobacterium tuberculosis: a review of the literature
;Lauren A. Dalvin;Wendy M. Smith
Vol. 7 , pp. 13-21
141 views Abstract
2017
mycobacteria in the literature: report 01-2016
;Joyce L Sanchez
Vol. 7 , pp. 49-50
94 views
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.