Indexed in Journament

genes & genomics

ISSN 2092-9293· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.4/100
Journament Score
#10,462
Journament Rank
25
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name genes genomics
Abbreviated Name genes genomics
ISSN 2092-9293
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/13258

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2018
Identification of differentially expressed genes in longissimus dorsi muscle between Wei and Yorkshire pigs using RNA sequencing.
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 413-421
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Genomic signatures of high-altitude adaptation in Ethiopian sheep populations.
Vol. 41 , No. 8 , pp. 973-981
315 views DOI Abstract
2020
Transcriptomic analyses reveal novel genes with sexually dimorphic expression in Takifugu rubripes brain during gonadal sex differentiation.
310 views DOI Abstract
2017
unsettling encounters: a response to katrin flikschuh’s ‘kant’s nomads
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 375-383
287 views DOI Abstract
2015
2015
solus secedo and sapere aude: cartesian meditation as kantian enlightenment
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 261-279
265 views Abstract
2017
a discussion around katrin flikschuh’s: kant’s nomads: encountering strangers
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 344-345
253 views DOI
2015
kant’s machiavellian moment
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 238-260
228 views Abstract
2015
correspondencia o armonía. la literatura en la distinción kantiana de las bellas artes
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 100-114
218 views Abstract
2020
Transcriptomic analyses reveal novel genes with sexually dimorphic expression in Takifugu rubripes brain during gonadal sex differentiation.
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
Genomic signatures of high-altitude adaptation in Ethiopian sheep populations.
Vol. 41 , No. 8 , pp. 973-981
315 views DOI Abstract
2018
Identification of differentially expressed genes in longissimus dorsi muscle between Wei and Yorkshire pigs using RNA sequencing.
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 413-421
401 views DOI Abstract
2017
la maschera cartesiana: rené descartes nella critica della ragion pura di kant
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 138-149
10 views DOI Abstract
2017
unsettling encounters: a response to katrin flikschuh’s ‘kant’s nomads
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 375-383
287 views DOI Abstract
2017
editorial guidelines for authors
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 539-543
54 views
2017
a discussion around katrin flikschuh’s: kant’s nomads: encountering strangers
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 344-345
253 views DOI
2017
la mutation du concept de moeurs dans la définition de la loi morale comme sittengesetz
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 94-115
197 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.