Indexed in Journament

genes & genomics

ISSN 2092-9293· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
22.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,097 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
25 Articles
Scores higher than 4.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name genes genomics
Abbreviated Name genes genomics
ISSN 2092-9293
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/13258

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 39.0 25.7
Community Impact 12.1 5.8
Content Distribution 48.4 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2018
Identification of differentially expressed genes in longissimus dorsi muscle between Wei and Yorkshire pigs using RNA sequencing.
Xu, Jingen;Wang, Chonglong;Jin, Erhui;Gu, Youfang;Li, Shenghe;Li, Qinggang;
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 413-421
414 views DOI Abstract
2020
Transcriptomic analyses reveal novel genes with sexually dimorphic expression in Takifugu rubripes brain during gonadal sex differentiation.
Shen, Xufang;Yan, Hongwei;Zhang, Lei;Yuan, Zhen;Liu, Wenlei;Wu, Yumeng;Liu, Qi;Luo, Xiaoyi;Liu, Ying;
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Genomic signatures of high-altitude adaptation in Ethiopian sheep populations.
Edea, Zewdu;Dadi, Hailu;Dessie, Tadelle;Kim, Kwan-Suk;
Vol. 41 , No. 8 , pp. 973-981
329 views DOI Abstract
2017
unsettling encounters: a response to katrin flikschuh’s ‘kant’s nomads
;Joël Madore
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 375-383
300 views DOI Abstract
2015
the ‘principle of equality governing the actions and counter-actions’ in kant’s practical philosophy
;Jean-Christophe Merle
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 62-71
283 views Abstract
2015
solus secedo and sapere aude: cartesian meditation as kantian enlightenment
;Suma Rajiva
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 261-279
275 views Abstract
2017
a discussion around katrin flikschuh’s: kant’s nomads: encountering strangers
;Joël Madore
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 344-345
261 views DOI
2015
reseña de i. kant, "antropología en sentido pragmático", pról. de reinhard brandt, trad. de dulce m.ª granja, gustavo leyva, peter storandt, notas, tabla de correspondencias y bibliografía de dulce m.ª granja, fondo de cultura económica, méxico, 2014
;Marilín Mercedes Gómez
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 259-262
256 views
2015
kant’s machiavellian moment
;Jay Foster
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 238-260
234 views Abstract
2015
correspondencia o armonía. la literatura en la distinción kantiana de las bellas artes
;Germán Garrido Miñambres
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 100-114
224 views Abstract
2020
Transcriptomic analyses reveal novel genes with sexually dimorphic expression in Takifugu rubripes brain during gonadal sex differentiation.
Shen, Xufang;Yan, Hongwei;Zhang, Lei;Yuan, Zhen;Liu, Wenlei;Wu, Yumeng;Liu, Qi;Luo, Xiaoyi;Liu, Ying;
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Genomic signatures of high-altitude adaptation in Ethiopian sheep populations.
Edea, Zewdu;Dadi, Hailu;Dessie, Tadelle;Kim, Kwan-Suk;
Vol. 41 , No. 8 , pp. 973-981
329 views DOI Abstract
2018
Identification of differentially expressed genes in longissimus dorsi muscle between Wei and Yorkshire pigs using RNA sequencing.
Xu, Jingen;Wang, Chonglong;Jin, Erhui;Gu, Youfang;Li, Shenghe;Li, Qinggang;
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 413-421
414 views DOI Abstract
2017
la maschera cartesiana: rené descartes nella critica della ragion pura di kant
;Alfredo Gatto
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 138-149
23 views DOI Abstract
2017
unsettling encounters: a response to katrin flikschuh’s ‘kant’s nomads
;Joël Madore
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 375-383
300 views DOI Abstract
2017
reseña de: nuria sánchez madrid: a civilizaçao como destino: kant e as formas da reflexão, florianópolis, nefiponline, 2016
;Marcos Thisted
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 503-507
30 views DOI
2017
editorial guidelines for authors
;CTK Revista
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 539-543
67 views
2017
reseña: greenberg, robert, the bounds of freedom: kant’s causal theory of action, de gruyter, berlin/boston, 2016
;Jesús González Fisac
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 497-502
195 views DOI
2017
a discussion around katrin flikschuh’s: kant’s nomads: encountering strangers
;Joël Madore
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 344-345
261 views DOI
2017
la mutation du concept de moeurs dans la définition de la loi morale comme sittengesetz
;Michèle Cohen-Halimi
Vol. 1 , No. 5 , pp. 94-115
211 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
22.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,097 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

22.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

39.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

48.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.