international journal of middle east studies | Journament

Journal Ranking

#685 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 bulan yang lalu

international journal of middle east studies

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Pengindeksan
scopus ulakbim soc
Nama Singkat international journal of middle east studies
Nama Singkatan
ISSN 0020-7438
Tujuan dan Ruang Lingkup
URL https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-middle-east-studies
Petunjuk untuk Penulis

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (60 total)

2015
extracellular adenosine generation in the regulation of pro-inflammatory responses and pathogen colonization
;M. Samiul Alam;Matthew G. Costales;Christopher Cavanaugh;Kristina Williams
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 775-792
340 views DOI Abstract
2014
evolutionary implications of metal binding features in different species’ prion protein: an inorganic point of view
;Diego La Mendola;Enrico Rizzarelli
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 546-565
333 views DOI Abstract
2018
antimicrobial peptides: diversity, mechanism of action and strategies to improve the activity and biocompatibility in vivo
;Prashant Kumar;Jayachandran N. Kizhakkedathu;Suzana K. Straus
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 4-
320 views DOI Abstract
2015
oxidative stress in fungi: its function in signal transduction, interaction with plant hosts, and lignocellulose degradation
;Michael Breitenbach;Manuela Weber;Mark Rinnerthaler;Thomas Karl;Lore Breitenbach-Koller
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 318-342
317 views DOI Abstract
2015
the effect of alcohol and hydrogen peroxide on liver hepcidin gene expression in mice lacking antioxidant enzymes, glutathione peroxidase-1 or catalase
;Duygu Dee Harrison-Findik;Sizhao Lu
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 793-807
308 views DOI Abstract
2015
chromatin remodeling and transcriptional control in innate immunity: emergence of akirin2 as a novel player
;Sarang Tartey;Osamu Takeuchi
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 1618-1633
298 views DOI Abstract
2015
rna-binding proteins in trichomonas vaginalis: atypical multifunctional proteins
;Elisa E. Figueroa-Angulo;Jaeson S. Calla-Choque;Maria Inocente Mancilla-Olea;Rossana Arroyo
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 3354-3395
295 views DOI Abstract
2015
fluorinated carbohydrates as lectin ligands: 19f-based direct std monitoring for detection of anomeric selectivity
;João P. Ribeiro;Tammo Diercks;Jesús Jiménez-Barbero;Sabine André;Hans-Joachim Gabius;Francisco Javier Cañada
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 3177-3192
293 views DOI Abstract
2016
aberrant glycosylation of anchor-optimized muc1 peptides can enhance antigen binding affinity and reverse tolerance to cytotoxic t lymphocytes
;Latha B. Pathangey;Vani Lakshminarayanan;Vera J. Suman;Barbara A. Pockaj;Pinku Mukherjee;Sandra J. Gendler
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 31-
280 views DOI Abstract
2015
a panel of recombinant mucins carrying a repertoire of sialylated o-glycans based on different core chains for studies of glycan binding proteins
;Reeja Maria Cherian;Chunsheng Jin;Jining Liu;Niclas G. Karlsson;Jan Holgersson
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 1810-1831
277 views DOI Abstract
View All 60 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
30
50
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.