arabian journal of geosciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1462 / 33,968
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

arabian journal of geosciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name arabian journal of geosciences
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/12517
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (31 total)

2014
results of use of fibrin glue for surgical treatment of urethral stricture
;D. Yu. Pushkar;A. V. Zhivov;M. R.M. Ismailov;M. R. Bagaudinov
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 49-53
403 views DOI Abstract
2015
smoking rates for men from infertile couples and men with reproductive disorders
;M. V. Andreeva;S. Sh. Khayat;T. M. Sorokina;L. V. Schileyko;T. V. Ostroumova;L. F. Kurilo
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 63-68
330 views Abstract
2012
Landslide susceptibility mapping at Vaz Watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: a comparison between multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basic function (RBF) algorithms
Mohammad Zare;Hamid Reza Pourghasemi;Mahdi Vafakhah;Biswajeet Pradhan;Mohammad Zare;Hamid Reza Pourghasemi;Mahdi Vafakhah;Biswajeet Pradhan;
Vol. 6 , No. 8 , pp. 2873-2888
326 views DOI Abstract
2013
Debris flow impact assessment caused by 14 April 2012 rainfall along the Al-Hada Highway, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia using high-resolution satellite imagery
Ahmed M. Youssef;Biswajeet Pradhan;Norbert H. Maerz;Ahmed M. Youssef;Biswajeet Pradhan;Norbert H. Maerz;
Vol. 7 , No. 7 , pp. 2591-2601
315 views DOI Abstract
2014
Landslide susceptibility mapping by frequency ratio and logistic regression methods: an example from Niksar–Resadiye (Tokat, Turkey)
Gokhan Demir;Mustafa Aytekin;Aykut Akgun;Gokhan Demir;Mustafa Aytekin;Aykut Akgun;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 1801-1812
301 views DOI Abstract
2011
Wrench structural deformation in ras al hilal-al athrun area, ne libya: A new contribution in northern al jabal al akhdar belt
El Amawy M.
Vol. 4 , pp. 1067-1085
290 views DOI
2015
genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of regulation, chronology and dynamics of spermatogenesis of mammals
;L. F. Kurilo;M. I. Shtaut
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 31-40
285 views Abstract
2019
Integration of in situ measurement of radiometric signatures and aeroradiometric data in geologic mapping of parts of southern Benue Trough and Anambra Basin
Eze, M.
Vol. 12 , pp. 0-0
279 views DOI
2019
Monitoring LULC changes and its impact on the LST and NDVI in District 1 of Shiraz City
Fatemi, M.
Vol. 12 , pp. 0-0
262 views DOI
2014
comparative rate and risk factors of recurrent urethral stricture during different surgical procedures
;D. Yu. Pushkar;A. V. Zhivov;O. B. Loran;A. V. Karpovich;M. R. Bagaudinov;M. R.M. Ismailov
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 37-44
250 views Abstract
View All 31 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.