asian journal of comparative law | Journament

Journal Ranking

#248 / 33,940
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

asian journal of comparative law

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name asian journal of comparative law
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/asian-journal-of-comparative-law
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (24 total)

2016
evaluation of seismic behavior and select optimal situation of cylindrical frictional dampers in steel structures
;Hamid Mirzaeefard;Masoud Mirtaheri Masoud Mirtaheri
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 18-30
302 views Abstract
2015
cooperative game theory approach to quantitative risk allocation in construction projects
;Farnad Nasirzade;Mahdi Rouhparvar;Hamed Mazandaranizadeh
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 61-74
274 views Abstract
2017
effects of calcined clay minerals and silica fume on the compressive strength of concrete
;Abolfazl Soltani;Amir Tarighat;Roohallah Rostami
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 33-50
254 views DOI Abstract
2016
numerical and experimental investigation of hollow steel columns strengthened with carbon fiber reinforced polymer
;Amir Hamzeh Keykha;Masoud Nekooei;Reza Rahgozar
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 49-58
251 views Abstract
2017
evaluation of using triangular plates as continuity plates in box column section in prequalified welded connections under cyclic loading
;Mohammad Ali Kafi;Payam Tarighi
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 120-138
239 views DOI Abstract
2012
Hilal and Halal: How to manage islamic pluralism in Indonesia?
Hosen N.
Vol. 7 , pp. 0-0
236 views DOI
2017
simulation of artificial earthquake records compatible with site specific response spectra using time series analysis
;Mohammad Reza Fadavi Amiri;Sayed Ali Soleymani Eyvari;Hamid Hasanpoor;Mohammad Shamekhi Amiri
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 68-80
228 views DOI Abstract
2017
an experimental study on mechanical properties of concrete containing steel and polypropylene fibers at high temperatures
;Madjid Gholhaki;Ghasem Pachideh;Omid Rezayfar
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 167-179
207 views DOI Abstract
2017
experimental assessment and numerical modeling of the nonlinear behavior of the masonry shear walls under in-plane cyclic loading considering the brickwork-setting effect
;Amir Hossein Karimi;Mohammad Saeed Karimi;Ali Kheyroddin;Abdulazim Amirshahkarami
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 19-32
205 views DOI Abstract
2017
seismic microzonation of tehran based on deterministic seismic hazard analysis and seismic indexes around faults
;Hamid Saffari;Mohammad Hossein Pouladvand
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 109-128
204 views DOI Abstract
View All 24 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
50
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.