pakistan journal of medical sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#665 / 33,972
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

pakistan journal of medical sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name pak j med sci
Abbreviated Name pak j med sci
ISSN 1682-024X
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.pjms.com.pk
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (55 total)

Employment status of person with disability in Government Departments in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan.
Arsh, Aatik;Darain, Haider;Zeb, Amir;Ullah, Sana;Ullah, Irfan;Ilyas, Syed Muhammad;
Vol. 35 , No. 5 , pp. 1392-1396
422 views DOI Abstract
2020
High proportion of overt diabetes mellitus in pregnancy and missed opportunity for early detection of diabetes at a tertiary care centre in Pakistan.
Wali, Aisha Syed;Rafique, Raheela;Iftikhar, Sundus;Ambreen, Rakhshinda;Yakoob, Mohammad Yawar;
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. S38-S43
396 views DOI Abstract
Pediatric cardiac arrest in the emergency department: Outcome is related to the time of admission.
Yurtseven, Ali;Turan, Caner;Akarca, Funda Karbek;Saz, Eylem Ulas;
Vol. 35 , No. 5 , pp. 1434-1440
390 views DOI Abstract
Change in corneal endothelial cell density after phacoemulsification in patients with type II diabetes mellitus.
Khalid, Muhammad;Hanif, Muhammad Kashif;Islam, Qamar Ul;Mehboob, Muhammad Asim;
Vol. 35 , No. 5 , pp. 1366-1369
384 views DOI Abstract
Potential use of multi-strain synbiotics for improving postnatal head circumference.
Guney Varal, Ipek;Koksal, Nilgun;Ozkan, Hilal;Bagci, Onur;Dogan, Pelin;
Vol. 34 , No. 6 , pp. 1502-1506
379 views DOI Abstract
Performance of Pediatrics' residents as clinical teachers: A student-based assessment.
Afzal, Muhammad Faheem;Ali, Abrar Ashraf;Hanif, Asif;
Vol. 35 , No. 6 , pp. 1499-1504
367 views DOI Abstract
Risk factors for mortality among inpatients with smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis.
Hameed, Sidra;Zuberi, Faisal Faiyaz;Hussain, Sagheer;Ali, Syed Khalid;
Vol. 35 , No. 5 , pp. 1361-1365
355 views DOI Abstract
Short-Term impacts of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in middle-aged university's employees with non-specific low back pain: A pilot study.
Abdelhalim, Nermeen Mohamed;Samhan, Ahmed Fathy;Abdelbasset, Walid Kamal;
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. 987-991
341 views DOI Abstract
Impact of waste management training intervention on knowledge, attitude and practices of teaching hospital workers in Pakistan.
Kumar, Ramesh;Somrongthong, Ratana;Ahmed, Jamil;
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 705-10
339 views DOI Abstract
Assessment of Psycho-Education of Carers Questionnaire: APEC-U" translation and cross cultural adaptation of an Urdu Version.
Haider, Imran Ijaz;Tiwana, Farah;Zohra, Noor;Rehman, Khaleeq Ur;
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. 1045-1049
335 views DOI Abstract
View All 55 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
50
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.