european journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the european society of surgical oncology and the british association of surgical oncology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#634 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

european journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the european society of surgical oncology and the british association of surgical oncology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name eur j surg oncol
Abbreviated Name eur j surg oncol
ISSN 1532-2157
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/european-journal-of-surgical-oncology
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (35 total)

2016
Improving survival and local control in rectal cancer in Catalonia (Spain) in the context of centralisation: A full cycle audit assessment.
Manchon-Walsh, P;Aliste, L;Espinàs, J A;Prades, J;Guarga, A;Balart, J;Biondo, S;Castells, A;Sanjuan, X;Tabernero, J;Borras, J M;, ;
Vol. 42 , No. 12 , pp. 1873-1880
382 views DOI Abstract
2018
Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
van Hilst, Jony;Korrel, Maarten;de Rooij, Thijs;Lof, Sanne;Busch, Olivier R;Groot Koerkamp, Bas;Kooby, David A;van Dieren, Susan;Abu Hilal, Mo;Besselink, Marc G;, ;
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
International validation and update of the Amsterdam model for prediction of survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.
van Roessel, Stijn;Strijker, Marin;Steyerberg, Ewout W;Groen, Jesse V;Mieog, J Sven;Groot, Vincent P;He, Jin;De Pastena, Matteo;Marchegiani, Giovanni;Bassi, Claudio;Suhool, Amal;Jang, Jin-Young;Busch, Olivier R;Halimi, Asif;Zarantonello, Laura;Groot Koerkamp, Bas;Samra, Jaswinder S;Mittal, Anubhav;Gill, Anthony J;Bolm, Louisa;van Eijck, Casper H;Abu Hilal, Mohammed;Del Chiaro, Marco;Keck, Tobias;Alseidi, Adnan;Wolfgang, Christopher L;Malleo, Giuseppe;Besselink, Marc G;
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
Does delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy following the curative resection affect the survival outcome of gastric cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lu, Huiwen;Zhao, Bochao;Zhang, Jiale;Huang, Rui;Wang, Zhenning;Xu, Huimian;Huang, Baojun;
319 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nationwide analysis of hospital variation in preoperative radiotherapy use for rectal cancer following guideline revision.
Detering, Robin;de Neree Tot Babberich, Michael P M;Bos, Amanda C R K;Dekker, Jan Willem T;Wouters, Michel W J M;Bemelman, Willem A;Beets-Tan, Regina G H;Marijnen, Corrie A M;Hompes, Roel;Tanis, Pieter J;, ;
298 views DOI Abstract
2013
old v. new journalism and the public sphere; or, habermas encounters dallas and stead
;Graham Law;Matthew Sterenberg
, No. 16 , pp. -
292 views DOI Abstract
2019
Management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy: An evidence-based update in a European breast center.
Garcia-Etienne, Carlos A;Ferrari, Alberta;Della Valle, Angelica;Lucioni, Marco;Ferraris, Elisa;Di Giulio, Giuseppe;Squillace, Luigi;Bonzano, Elisabetta;Lasagna, Angioletta;Rizzo, Gianpiero;Tancredi, Richard;Scotti Foglieni, Andrea;Dionigi, Francesca;Grasso, Maurizia;Arbustini, Eloisa;Cavenaghi, Giorgio;Pedrazzoli, Paolo;Filippi, Andrea R;Dionigi, Paolo;Sgarella, Adele;
288 views DOI Abstract
2011
‘wot larx!’: william morris, charles dickens, and fatherly feelings
;Wendy Parkins
, No. 14 , pp. -
261 views DOI Abstract
2010
dickens in the city: science, technology, ecology in the novels of charles dickens
;John Parham
, No. 10 , pp. -
260 views DOI Abstract
2017
introduction: replicating bodies in nineteenth-century science and culture
;Will Abberley
, No. 24 , pp. -
258 views DOI
View All 35 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.