Indexed in Journament

european journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the european society of surgical oncology and the british association of surgical oncology

ISSN 1532-2157· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,577 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
35 Articles
Scores higher than 40% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name eur j surg oncol
Abbreviated Name eur j surg oncol
ISSN 1532-2157
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/european-journal-of-surgical-oncology

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 26.3
Innovation 64.5 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 4.3
Content Distribution 73.6 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (35)

2016
Improving survival and local control in rectal cancer in Catalonia (Spain) in the context of centralisation: A full cycle audit assessment.
Manchon-Walsh, P;Aliste, L;Espinàs, J A;Prades, J;Guarga, A;Balart, J;Biondo, S;Castells, A;Sanjuan, X;Tabernero, J;Borras, J M;, ;
Vol. 42 , No. 12 , pp. 1873-1880
463 views DOI Abstract
2018
Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
van Hilst, Jony;Korrel, Maarten;de Rooij, Thijs;Lof, Sanne;Busch, Olivier R;Groot Koerkamp, Bas;Kooby, David A;van Dieren, Susan;Abu Hilal, Mo;Besselink, Marc G;, ;
441 views DOI Abstract
2019
International validation and update of the Amsterdam model for prediction of survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.
van Roessel, Stijn;Strijker, Marin;Steyerberg, Ewout W;Groen, Jesse V;Mieog, J Sven;Groot, Vincent P;He, Jin;De Pastena, Matteo;Marchegiani, Giovanni;Bassi, Claudio;Suhool, Amal;Jang, Jin-Young;Busch, Olivier R;Halimi, Asif;Zarantonello, Laura;Groot Koerkamp, Bas;Samra, Jaswinder S;Mittal, Anubhav;Gill, Anthony J;Bolm, Louisa;van Eijck, Casper H;Abu Hilal, Mohammed;Del Chiaro, Marco;Keck, Tobias;Alseidi, Adnan;Wolfgang, Christopher L;Malleo, Giuseppe;Besselink, Marc G;
417 views DOI Abstract
2020
Does delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy following the curative resection affect the survival outcome of gastric cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lu, Huiwen;Zhao, Bochao;Zhang, Jiale;Huang, Rui;Wang, Zhenning;Xu, Huimian;Huang, Baojun;
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nationwide analysis of hospital variation in preoperative radiotherapy use for rectal cancer following guideline revision.
Detering, Robin;de Neree Tot Babberich, Michael P M;Bos, Amanda C R K;Dekker, Jan Willem T;Wouters, Michel W J M;Bemelman, Willem A;Beets-Tan, Regina G H;Marijnen, Corrie A M;Hompes, Roel;Tanis, Pieter J;, ;
388 views DOI Abstract
2013
old v. new journalism and the public sphere; or, habermas encounters dallas and stead
;Graham Law;Matthew Sterenberg
, No. 16 , pp. -
369 views DOI Abstract
2011
‘wot larx!’: william morris, charles dickens, and fatherly feelings
;Wendy Parkins
, No. 14 , pp. -
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
Management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy: An evidence-based update in a European breast center.
Garcia-Etienne, Carlos A;Ferrari, Alberta;Della Valle, Angelica;Lucioni, Marco;Ferraris, Elisa;Di Giulio, Giuseppe;Squillace, Luigi;Bonzano, Elisabetta;Lasagna, Angioletta;Rizzo, Gianpiero;Tancredi, Richard;Scotti Foglieni, Andrea;Dionigi, Francesca;Grasso, Maurizia;Arbustini, Eloisa;Cavenaghi, Giorgio;Pedrazzoli, Paolo;Filippi, Andrea R;Dionigi, Paolo;Sgarella, Adele;
336 views DOI Abstract
2010
dickens in the city: science, technology, ecology in the novels of charles dickens
;John Parham
, No. 10 , pp. -
325 views DOI Abstract
2014
dream touch
;Gillian Beer
, No. 19 , pp. -
322 views DOI Abstract
2020
Does delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy following the curative resection affect the survival outcome of gastric cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lu, Huiwen;Zhao, Bochao;Zhang, Jiale;Huang, Rui;Wang, Zhenning;Xu, Huimian;Huang, Baojun;
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
International validation and update of the Amsterdam model for prediction of survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.
van Roessel, Stijn;Strijker, Marin;Steyerberg, Ewout W;Groen, Jesse V;Mieog, J Sven;Groot, Vincent P;He, Jin;De Pastena, Matteo;Marchegiani, Giovanni;Bassi, Claudio;Suhool, Amal;Jang, Jin-Young;Busch, Olivier R;Halimi, Asif;Zarantonello, Laura;Groot Koerkamp, Bas;Samra, Jaswinder S;Mittal, Anubhav;Gill, Anthony J;Bolm, Louisa;van Eijck, Casper H;Abu Hilal, Mohammed;Del Chiaro, Marco;Keck, Tobias;Alseidi, Adnan;Wolfgang, Christopher L;Malleo, Giuseppe;Besselink, Marc G;
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nationwide analysis of hospital variation in preoperative radiotherapy use for rectal cancer following guideline revision.
Detering, Robin;de Neree Tot Babberich, Michael P M;Bos, Amanda C R K;Dekker, Jan Willem T;Wouters, Michel W J M;Bemelman, Willem A;Beets-Tan, Regina G H;Marijnen, Corrie A M;Hompes, Roel;Tanis, Pieter J;, ;
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy: An evidence-based update in a European breast center.
Garcia-Etienne, Carlos A;Ferrari, Alberta;Della Valle, Angelica;Lucioni, Marco;Ferraris, Elisa;Di Giulio, Giuseppe;Squillace, Luigi;Bonzano, Elisabetta;Lasagna, Angioletta;Rizzo, Gianpiero;Tancredi, Richard;Scotti Foglieni, Andrea;Dionigi, Francesca;Grasso, Maurizia;Arbustini, Eloisa;Cavenaghi, Giorgio;Pedrazzoli, Paolo;Filippi, Andrea R;Dionigi, Paolo;Sgarella, Adele;
336 views DOI Abstract
2018
Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
van Hilst, Jony;Korrel, Maarten;de Rooij, Thijs;Lof, Sanne;Busch, Olivier R;Groot Koerkamp, Bas;Kooby, David A;van Dieren, Susan;Abu Hilal, Mo;Besselink, Marc G;, ;
441 views DOI Abstract
2017
introduction: replicating bodies in nineteenth-century science and culture
;Will Abberley
, No. 24 , pp. -
320 views DOI
2016
‘a token of their love’: queen victoria memorials in new zealand
;Mark Stocker
Vol. 2016 , No. 22 , pp. -
221 views DOI Abstract
2016
Improving survival and local control in rectal cancer in Catalonia (Spain) in the context of centralisation: A full cycle audit assessment.
Manchon-Walsh, P;Aliste, L;Espinàs, J A;Prades, J;Guarga, A;Balart, J;Biondo, S;Castells, A;Sanjuan, X;Tabernero, J;Borras, J M;, ;
Vol. 42 , No. 12 , pp. 1873-1880
463 views DOI Abstract
2015
prototyping an electronic edition of william blake’s manuscript of <i>vala, or the four zoas</i>: a progress report
;Morris Eaves;Eric Loy;Hardeep Sidhu;Laura Whitebell
Vol. 2015 , No. 21 , pp. -
198 views DOI Abstract
2015
‘all touched my hand’: queenly sentiment and royal prerogative
;Rachel Bates
Vol. 2015 , No. 20 , pp. -
181 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,577 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

29.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

64.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.