Indexed in Journament

frontiers in aging neuroscience

ISSN 1663-4365· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.0/100
Journament Score
#3,658
Journament Rank
16
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name front aging neurosci
Abbreviated Name front aging neurosci
ISSN 1663-4365
URL http://www.frontiersin.org/aging_neuroscience

Indexings

ncbi doaj ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2018
Alterations in Brain Network Topology and Structural-Functional Connectome Coupling Relate to Cognitive Impairment.
Vol. 10 , pp. 404
409 views DOI Abstract
2017
Neuroprotective and Anti-Aging Potentials of Essential Oils from Aromatic and Medicinal Plants
Vol. 9 , pp. -
392 views Abstract
2019
Altered Global Synchronizations in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Resting-State fMRI Study.
Vol. 11 , pp. 139
384 views DOI Abstract
2016
Glucose Tightly Controls Morphological and Functional Properties of Astrocytes.
Vol. 8 , pp. 82
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relationship Between Risk Factors and Brain Reserve in Late Middle Age: Implications for Cognitive Aging.
Vol. 11 , pp. 355
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predicting MCI Status From Multimodal Language Data Using Cascaded Classifiers.
Vol. 11 , pp. 205
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Transfer Effects of Cognitive Training on Working Memory Among Chinese Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Vol. 11 , pp. 212
347 views DOI Abstract
2018
Commentary: Donepezil enhances understanding of degraded speech in Alzheimer's disease
Vol. 10 , pp. -
327 views
2020
Induced Suppression of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Favorably Changes Interhemispheric Communication During Bimanual Coordination in Older Adults-A Neuronavigated rTMS Study.
Vol. 12 , pp. 149
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
Flavonoids as Prospective Neuroprotectants and Their Therapeutic Propensity in Aging Associated Neurological Disorders
Vol. 11 , pp. -
308 views Abstract
2020
Induced Suppression of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Favorably Changes Interhemispheric Communication During Bimanual Coordination in Older Adults-A Neuronavigated rTMS Study.
Vol. 12 , pp. 149
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Delayed Advantage: Multi-Session Training at Evening Hours Leads to Better Long-Term Retention of Motor Skill in the Elderly
Vol. 11 , pp. -
136 views Abstract
2019
Relationship Between Risk Factors and Brain Reserve in Late Middle Age: Implications for Cognitive Aging.
Vol. 11 , pp. 355
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Altered Global Synchronizations in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Resting-State fMRI Study.
Vol. 11 , pp. 139
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Transfer Effects of Cognitive Training on Working Memory Among Chinese Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Vol. 11 , pp. 212
347 views DOI Abstract
2019
Flavonoids as Prospective Neuroprotectants and Their Therapeutic Propensity in Aging Associated Neurological Disorders
Vol. 11 , pp. -
308 views Abstract
2019
Predicting MCI Status From Multimodal Language Data Using Cascaded Classifiers.
Vol. 11 , pp. 205
360 views DOI Abstract
2018
Commentary: Donepezil enhances understanding of degraded speech in Alzheimer's disease
Vol. 10 , pp. -
327 views
2018
Alterations in Brain Network Topology and Structural-Functional Connectome Coupling Relate to Cognitive Impairment.
Vol. 10 , pp. 404
409 views DOI Abstract
2017
globalization of the
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. 1-1
122 views DOI
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

42.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.