Indexed in Journament

frontiers in aging neuroscience

ISSN 1663-4365· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.0 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #5,732 of 33,995 indexed journals
16 Articles
Accessibility 35
Engagement 31
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name front aging neurosci
Abbreviated Name front aging neurosci
ISSN 1663-4365
URL http://www.frontiersin.org/aging_neuroscience

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2018
Alterations in Brain Network Topology and Structural-Functional Connectome Coupling Relate to Cognitive Impairment.
Vol. 10 , pp. 404
416 views DOI Abstract
2016
Glucose Tightly Controls Morphological and Functional Properties of Astrocytes.
Vol. 8 , pp. 82
402 views DOI Abstract
2017
Neuroprotective and Anti-Aging Potentials of Essential Oils from Aromatic and Medicinal Plants
Vol. 9 , pp. -
399 views Abstract
2019
Altered Global Synchronizations in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Resting-State fMRI Study.
Vol. 11 , pp. 139
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relationship Between Risk Factors and Brain Reserve in Late Middle Age: Implications for Cognitive Aging.
Vol. 11 , pp. 355
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predicting MCI Status From Multimodal Language Data Using Cascaded Classifiers.
Vol. 11 , pp. 205
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Transfer Effects of Cognitive Training on Working Memory Among Chinese Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Vol. 11 , pp. 212
355 views DOI Abstract
2018
Commentary: Donepezil enhances understanding of degraded speech in Alzheimer's disease
Vol. 10 , pp. -
337 views
2020
Induced Suppression of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Favorably Changes Interhemispheric Communication During Bimanual Coordination in Older Adults-A Neuronavigated rTMS Study.
Vol. 12 , pp. 149
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Flavonoids as Prospective Neuroprotectants and Their Therapeutic Propensity in Aging Associated Neurological Disorders
Vol. 11 , pp. -
328 views Abstract
2020
Induced Suppression of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Favorably Changes Interhemispheric Communication During Bimanual Coordination in Older Adults-A Neuronavigated rTMS Study.
Vol. 12 , pp. 149
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Delayed Advantage: Multi-Session Training at Evening Hours Leads to Better Long-Term Retention of Motor Skill in the Elderly
Vol. 11 , pp. -
140 views Abstract
2019
Relationship Between Risk Factors and Brain Reserve in Late Middle Age: Implications for Cognitive Aging.
Vol. 11 , pp. 355
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
Altered Global Synchronizations in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Resting-State fMRI Study.
Vol. 11 , pp. 139
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Transfer Effects of Cognitive Training on Working Memory Among Chinese Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Vol. 11 , pp. 212
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
Flavonoids as Prospective Neuroprotectants and Their Therapeutic Propensity in Aging Associated Neurological Disorders
Vol. 11 , pp. -
328 views Abstract
2019
Predicting MCI Status From Multimodal Language Data Using Cascaded Classifiers.
Vol. 11 , pp. 205
369 views DOI Abstract
2018
Commentary: Donepezil enhances understanding of degraded speech in Alzheimer's disease
Vol. 10 , pp. -
337 views
2018
Alterations in Brain Network Topology and Structural-Functional Connectome Coupling Relate to Cognitive Impairment.
Vol. 10 , pp. 404
416 views DOI Abstract
2017
globalization of the
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. 1-1
126 views DOI
Journament Score
42.0/100 · Below Average
Ranked #5,732 of 33,995

Overall Quality Score

42.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.