Indexed in Journament

frontiers in aging neuroscience

ISSN 1663-4365· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.3 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,332 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
16 Articles
Scores higher than 95.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name front aging neurosci
Abbreviated Name front aging neurosci
ISSN 1663-4365
URL http://www.frontiersin.org/aging_neuroscience

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for frontiers in aging neuroscience
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 72.2 22.7
Innovation 57.0 24.1
Community Impact 12.9 4.2
Content Distribution 77.6 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2018
Alterations in Brain Network Topology and Structural-Functional Connectome Coupling Relate to Cognitive Impairment.
Vol. 10 , pp. 404
427 views DOI Abstract
2016
Glucose Tightly Controls Morphological and Functional Properties of Astrocytes.
Vol. 8 , pp. 82
419 views DOI Abstract
2017
Neuroprotective and Anti-Aging Potentials of Essential Oils from Aromatic and Medicinal Plants
Vol. 9 , pp. -
413 views Abstract
2019
Relationship Between Risk Factors and Brain Reserve in Late Middle Age: Implications for Cognitive Aging.
Vol. 11 , pp. 355
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Altered Global Synchronizations in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Resting-State fMRI Study.
Vol. 11 , pp. 139
408 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predicting MCI Status From Multimodal Language Data Using Cascaded Classifiers.
Vol. 11 , pp. 205
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Transfer Effects of Cognitive Training on Working Memory Among Chinese Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Vol. 11 , pp. 212
364 views DOI Abstract
2020
Induced Suppression of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Favorably Changes Interhemispheric Communication During Bimanual Coordination in Older Adults-A Neuronavigated rTMS Study.
Vol. 12 , pp. 149
350 views DOI Abstract
2018
Commentary: Donepezil enhances understanding of degraded speech in Alzheimer's disease
Vol. 10 , pp. -
348 views
2019
Flavonoids as Prospective Neuroprotectants and Their Therapeutic Propensity in Aging Associated Neurological Disorders
Vol. 11 , pp. -
336 views Abstract
2020
Induced Suppression of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Favorably Changes Interhemispheric Communication During Bimanual Coordination in Older Adults-A Neuronavigated rTMS Study.
Vol. 12 , pp. 149
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Delayed Advantage: Multi-Session Training at Evening Hours Leads to Better Long-Term Retention of Motor Skill in the Elderly
Vol. 11 , pp. -
151 views Abstract
2019
Relationship Between Risk Factors and Brain Reserve in Late Middle Age: Implications for Cognitive Aging.
Vol. 11 , pp. 355
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Altered Global Synchronizations in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Resting-State fMRI Study.
Vol. 11 , pp. 139
408 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Transfer Effects of Cognitive Training on Working Memory Among Chinese Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Vol. 11 , pp. 212
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
Flavonoids as Prospective Neuroprotectants and Their Therapeutic Propensity in Aging Associated Neurological Disorders
Vol. 11 , pp. -
336 views Abstract
2019
Predicting MCI Status From Multimodal Language Data Using Cascaded Classifiers.
Vol. 11 , pp. 205
379 views DOI Abstract
2018
Commentary: Donepezil enhances understanding of degraded speech in Alzheimer's disease
Vol. 10 , pp. -
348 views
2018
Alterations in Brain Network Topology and Structural-Functional Connectome Coupling Relate to Cognitive Impairment.
Vol. 10 , pp. 404
427 views DOI Abstract
2017
globalization of the
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. 1-1
140 views DOI
Journament Score
40.3/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,332 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

72.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

57.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.