journal of the chemical society, faraday transactions | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2441 / 33,982
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

journal of the chemical society, faraday transactions

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name journal of the chemical society, faraday transactions
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/ft
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2018
the toxic effect of lanthanum on planaria is mediated by a variety of ion channels
;Wayne Briner
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 33-
500 views DOI Abstract
1994
<sup>27</sup>Al and <sup>29</sup>Si solid-state NMR studies of dealuminated mordenite
Barras J.
Vol. 90 , pp. 3719-3723
408 views DOI
2013
ecotoxicology: the challenges for the 21st century
;Marco Vighi;Sara Villa
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 18-35
275 views DOI Abstract
1990
Time-dependent quantum dynamics of molecular photofragmentation processes
Gabriel G. Balint-Kurti,C. Clay Marston,Richard N. Dixon;Gabriel G. Balint-Kurti;C. Clay Marston;Richard N. Dixon;
Vol. 86 , No. 10 , pp. 1741-1749
273 views DOI Abstract
2014
developmental neurotoxicity of 3,3',4,4'-tetrachloroazobenzene with thyroxine deficit: sensitivity of glia and dentate granule neurons in the absence of behavioral changes
;G. Jean Harry;Michelle J. Hooth;Molly Vallant;Mamta Behl;Gregory S. Travlos;James L. Howard;Catherine J. Price;Sandra McBride;Ron Mervis;Peter R. Mouton
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 496-532
260 views DOI Abstract
2014
comparison of neurological function in males and females from two substrains of c57bl/6 mice
;Amy Ashworth;Mark E. Bardgett;Jocelyn Fowler;Helen Garber;Molly Griffith;Christine Perdan Curran
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 1-17
239 views DOI Abstract
2018
cadmium nephrotoxicity is associated with altered microrna expression in the rat renal cortex
;Michael J. Fay;Lauren A. C. Alt;Dominika Ryba;Ribhi Salamah;Ryan Peach;Alexander Papaeliou;Sabina Zawadzka;Andrew Weiss;Nil Patel;Asad Rahman;Zyaria Stubbs-Russell;Peter C. Lamar;Joshua R. Edwards;Walter C. Prozialeck
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 16-
215 views DOI Abstract
2018
proposal for a monitoring concept for veterinary medicinal products with pbt properties, using parasiticides as a case study
;Jörg Römbke;Karen Duis
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 14-
205 views DOI Abstract
2014
the chemistry and toxicology of depleted uranium
;Sidney A. Katz
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 50-78
198 views DOI Abstract
2014
methods for assessing basic particle properties and cytotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles
;Olga-Ioanna Kalantzi;George Biskos
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 79-91
188 views DOI Abstract
View All 13 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
50
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.