Indexed in Journament

drug research

ISSN 2194-9387· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.7 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,367 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
89 Articles
Scores higher than 95.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name drug res (stuttg)
Abbreviated Name drug res (stuttg)
ISSN 2194-9387
URL https://shop.thieme.com/drug-research/2194-9379

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for drug research
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 68.9 26.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 4.4
Content Distribution 81.5 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (89)

2019
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in Tonic, Phasic and Inflammatory Mouse Models.
428 views DOI Abstract
2013
issues in localization of brain function: the case of lateralized frontal cortex in cognition, emotion, and psychopathology
Vol. 7 , pp. -
419 views DOI Abstract
2017
impaired fear extinction due to a deficit in ca2+ influx through l-type voltage-gated ca2+ channels in mice deficient for tenascin-c
Vol. 11 , pp. -
401 views DOI Abstract
2014
differential processing of natural scenes in typical and atypical alzheimer disease measured with a saccade choice task
Vol. 8 , pp. -
399 views DOI Abstract
2015
looming sensitive cortical regions without v1 input: evidence from a patient with bilateral cortical blindness
Vol. 9 , pp. -
396 views DOI Abstract
2020
Dig & Delve into Protein Based Nanoformulations.
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of a Carrier Free Dry Powder Inhalation Formulation of Ketotifen for Pulmonary Drug Delivery.
383 views DOI Abstract
2013
immune responses at brain barriers and implications for brain development and neurological function in later life
Vol. 7 , pp. -
382 views DOI Abstract
2020
Anti-lipidemic Effect of Fractions of Peristrophe bivalvis Leaf in NG-nitro-L-arginine Methyl Ester (L-NAME) Treated Rats.
324 views DOI Abstract
2020
Dig & Delve into Protein Based Nanoformulations.
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of a Carrier Free Dry Powder Inhalation Formulation of Ketotifen for Pulmonary Drug Delivery.
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Graph Theoretical Analysis, Insilico Modeling and Formulation of Pyrimidine Nanoparticles as p38α MAP Kinases inhibitors: A Quantitative Proteomics Approach.
Vol. 69 , No. 2 , pp. 100-110
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in Tonic, Phasic and Inflammatory Mouse Models.
428 views DOI Abstract
2018
sex differences in affective facial reactions are present in childhood
Vol. 12 , pp. -
279 views DOI Abstract
2018
structural variation of chondroitin sulfate chains contributes to the molecular heterogeneity of perineuronal nets
Vol. 12 , pp. -
294 views DOI Abstract
2017
who has done it? exploring gaze agency in obsessive-compulsive checkers
Vol. 11 , pp. -
348 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
41.7/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,367 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

41.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

68.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

81.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.