Indexed in Journament

progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

ISSN 0079-6565· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
24.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,133 of 29,301 scored journals (34,035 indexed)
35 Articles
Scores higher than 3.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
ISSN 0079-6565
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/progress-in-nuclear-magnetic-resonance-spectroscopy

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.6
Accessibility 20.0 23.3
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 11.1 25.9
Innovation 15.0 24.1
Community Impact 11.4 6.7
Content Distribution 72.0 89.8
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (35)

2016
Recent advances in application of (27)Al NMR spectroscopy to materials science.
Vol. 94-95 , pp. 11-36
505 views DOI Abstract
¿qué indicadores son considerados por enfermería para conseguir una diálisis perfecta en el paciente en hemodiafiltración en línea?
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 115-120
390 views DOI Abstract
2012
adherencia al tratamiento inmunosupresor en el paciente adulto con trasplante renal immunosuppressive treatment compliance in adult renal transplant patient
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 300-305
276 views
2014
evaluación del optimismo disposicional en pacientes en hemodiálisis y su relación con las complicaciones
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 261-268
258 views Abstract
2014
calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (cvrs) en un paciente con mieloma múltiple en tratamiento sustitutivo de diálisis con tres versiones distintas (hdf, hfr, hd): a propósito de un caso
Vol. 17 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 48-48
255 views
2012
estandarización de cuidados del síndrome metabólico en diálisis peritoneal standardising care of metabolic syndrome in peritoneal dialysis
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 129-137
240 views Abstract
2012
efectividad de las intervenciones de enfermería en el control del fósforo
Vol. 15 , pp. 110-110
231 views
2015
actitud de la enfermería nefrológica ante la implementación de taxonomía nanda, nic, noc en el informe de continuidad de cuidados en hemodiálisis
Vol. 18 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 38-39
217 views
prevalencia de ansiedad y depresión en pacientes de hemodiálisis
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 112-117
217 views Abstract
2014
Índice tobillo-brazo en trasplante renal, un método sencillo que permite detectar de forma precoz la arteriopatía periférica
Vol. 17 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 85-85
210 views
2016
Recent advances in application of (27)Al NMR spectroscopy to materials science.
Vol. 94-95 , pp. 11-36
505 views DOI Abstract
2015
hemodiálisis a un paciente en tratamiento con yodo radioactivo (i-131)
Vol. 18 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 21-21
157 views
2015
hemodiálisis pediátrica: una necesidad puede ser una realidad. una experiencia maravillosa en nuestra unidad
Vol. 18 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 56-56
184 views
2015
diagnósticos de enfermería de mayor frecuencia en reingresos del paciente trasplantado renal
Vol. 18 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 76-76
205 views
2015
plan de seguridad para una unidad de hemodiálisis ii
Vol. 18 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 125-126
179 views
2015
valoración y diagnóstico del síndrome de burnout en profesionales sanitarios de una unidad de nefrología pediátrica
Vol. 18 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 86-86
208 views
2015
actitud de la enfermería nefrológica ante la implementación de taxonomía nanda, nic, noc en el informe de continuidad de cuidados en hemodiálisis
Vol. 18 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 38-39
217 views
2014
evaluación del optimismo disposicional en pacientes en hemodiálisis y su relación con las complicaciones
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 261-268
258 views Abstract
2014
premios congreso seden toledo 2014
Vol. 17 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 8-8
183 views
2014
valoración del dolor de los pacientes en hemodiálisis en nuestra unidad
Vol. 17 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 31-31
174 views
Journament Score
24.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,133 of 29,301 scored
(34,035 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

24.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

15.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.