progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1174 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim sci
Short Name progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Abbreviated Name
ISSN 0079-6565
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/progress-in-nuclear-magnetic-resonance-spectroscopy
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (35 total)

2016
Recent advances in application of (27)Al NMR spectroscopy to materials science.
Haouas, Mohamed;Taulelle, Francis;Martineau, Charlotte;
Vol. 94-95 , pp. 11-36
408 views DOI Abstract
¿qué indicadores son considerados por enfermería para conseguir una diálisis perfecta en el paciente en hemodiafiltración en línea?
;Ana Vanessa Fernández Martínez;Josefa Piñero Martínez;Yanina Arregui Arias;Rosario Pérez García;Alicia Moreno Vallejo;Francisco Rodríguez Martínez;Francisco José Orenes Bernabé;Matthew Mc Ginn
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 115-120
241 views DOI Abstract
2012
adherencia al tratamiento inmunosupresor en el paciente adulto con trasplante renal immunosuppressive treatment compliance in adult renal transplant patient
;María Isabel Durán Muñoz;Teresa Lope Andrea;María Rosario del Pino Jurado;María Cristina Chicharro Chicharro;Elisa Matilla Villar
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 300-305
218 views
2014
evaluación del optimismo disposicional en pacientes en hemodiálisis y su relación con las complicaciones
;Isabel Luque Cantarero;María del Carmen López Toledano;Irene Torollo Luna;Rodolfo Crespo Montero
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 261-268
199 views Abstract
2014
calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (cvrs) en un paciente con mieloma múltiple en tratamiento sustitutivo de diálisis con tres versiones distintas (hdf, hfr, hd): a propósito de un caso
;Sergio Antonio Granados Camacho;Belén Sánchez García;Juan José Mansilla Francisco;Ana Rebollo Rubio;José Antonio González Castillo
Vol. 17 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 48-48
198 views
2012
estandarización de cuidados del síndrome metabólico en diálisis peritoneal standardising care of metabolic syndrome in peritoneal dialysis
;Francisco Cirera Segura;Myriam Ruiz Montes;Verónica Rosales Sánchez;Jesús Lucas Martín Espejo
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 129-137
185 views Abstract
2012
efectividad de las intervenciones de enfermería en el control del fósforo
;Mª José Díaz Martínez;Mª Emma González Suárez;Esther González Suárez;Carmen Fernández Merayo
Vol. 15 , pp. 110-110
176 views
2015
valoración y diagnóstico del síndrome de burnout en profesionales sanitarios de una unidad de nefrología pediátrica
;Elisabet Escobedo Mesas;Pedro Bernal Herrera;Flora López González;Antonio Grande Trillo
Vol. 18 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 86-86
157 views
2012
elaboracion de un plan de acogida a los profesionales de nueva incorporacion en la unidad de pacientes renales hospitalizados
;Trinidad López Sánchez;Mª Luz Amoedo Cabrera;Marta Pérez Doctor
Vol. 15 , pp. 172-173
152 views
externalización del entrenamiento en diálisis peritoneal: riesgos sin beneficio
;Miguel Núñez Moral
Vol. 20 , No. 3 , pp. 207-208
152 views DOI
View All 35 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.