Indexed in Journament

journal of biomaterials applications

ISSN 1530-8022· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #20,529 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
18 Articles
Scores higher than 29.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j biomater appl
Abbreviated Name j biomater appl
ISSN 1530-8022
URL http://www.sagepub.com/journals/Journal201576/title

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 22.2 26.4
Innovation 45.0 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 4.4
Content Distribution 70.1 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2019
In vitro performance of a nanobiocomposite scaffold containing boron-modified bioactive glass nanoparticles for dentin regeneration.
Moonesi Rad, Reza;Pazarçeviren, Engin;Ece Akgün, Elif;Evis, Zafer;Keskin, Dilek;Şahin, Sıla;Tezcaner, Ayşen;
Vol. 33 , No. 6 , pp. 834-853
519 views DOI Abstract
2016
Long-lasting and bioactive hyaluronic acid-hydroxyapatite composite hydrogels for injectable dermal fillers: Physical properties and in vivo durability.
Jeong, Seol-Ha;Fan, Ying-Fang;Baek, Jae-Uk;Song, Juha;Choi, Tae-Hyun;Kim, Suk-Wha;Kim, Hyoun-Ee;
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 464-74
514 views DOI Abstract
2016
Effect of the incorporation of chitosan on the physico-chemical, mechanical properties and biological activity on a mixture of polycaprolactone and polyurethanes obtained from castor oil
Arévalo F.
Vol. 31 , pp. 708-720
463 views DOI
2011
In vitro and in vivo evaluations of 3D porous TCP-coated and non-coated alumina scaffolds.
Kim, Young-Hee;Anirban, Jyoti M;Song, Ho-Yeon;Seo, Hyung-Seok;Lee, Byong-Taek;
Vol. 25 , No. 6 , pp. 539-58
452 views DOI Abstract
2018
Silicate-doped nano-hydroxyapatite/graphene oxide composite reinforced fibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Dalgic, Ali Deniz;Alshemary, Ammar Z;Tezcaner, Ayşen;Keskin, Dilek;Evis, Zafer;
Vol. 32 , No. 10 , pp. 1392-1405
439 views DOI Abstract
2014
Physicochemical and in vitro biocompatibility evaluation of water-soluble CdSe/ZnS core/shell.
Painuly, Diksha;Bhatt, Anugya;Krishnan, Venkiteswaran Kalliyana;
Vol. 28 , No. 8 , pp. 1125-37
412 views DOI Abstract
2016
pochekaev r.yu. chinggis khan’s great yasa in the mongol empire and chinggisid states of the 13th–14th centuries: legal code or ideal “law and order”?
;R.Yu. Pochekaev
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 724-733
371 views DOI Abstract
2016
rashid al-din. shu’ab-i panjganah. 2. the mongols and the turks (2)
;Ch.I. Khamidova
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 868-880
329 views DOI Abstract
2018
historical examples in the letters of ivan iv to the crimean khanate and the nogai horde
;M.V. Moiseev
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 283-303
298 views DOI Abstract
2017
rashid al-din. shu’ab-i panjganah. 2. the mongols and turks (3)
;Khamidova Ch.I.
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 846-865
270 views DOI Abstract
2019
In vitro performance of a nanobiocomposite scaffold containing boron-modified bioactive glass nanoparticles for dentin regeneration.
Moonesi Rad, Reza;Pazarçeviren, Engin;Ece Akgün, Elif;Evis, Zafer;Keskin, Dilek;Şahin, Sıla;Tezcaner, Ayşen;
Vol. 33 , No. 6 , pp. 834-853
519 views DOI Abstract
2018
two medieval tatar tombstones from kasimov.
;I.V. Zaytsev
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 304-311
236 views DOI Abstract
2018
historical examples in the letters of ivan iv to the crimean khanate and the nogai horde
;M.V. Moiseev
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 283-303
298 views DOI Abstract
2018
Silicate-doped nano-hydroxyapatite/graphene oxide composite reinforced fibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Dalgic, Ali Deniz;Alshemary, Ammar Z;Tezcaner, Ayşen;Keskin, Dilek;Evis, Zafer;
Vol. 32 , No. 10 , pp. 1392-1405
439 views DOI Abstract
2017
actual problems of kazakh history. review of the book by k.a. pishchulina “essays on the history of the kazakh khanate”
;A.A. Galiyev
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 466-473
236 views DOI Abstract
2017
the tūqmāq and the ming china: the tūqmāq and the chinese relations during the ming period (1394–1456)
;Kenzheakhmet N.
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 770-785
224 views DOI Abstract
2017
rashid al-din. shu’ab-i panjganah. 2. the mongols and turks (3)
;Khamidova Ch.I.
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 846-865
270 views DOI Abstract
2017
“speeches” of sigismund ii’s courier, mikhail garaburda, addressed to the crimean qalga muhammad giray (1559)
;A.A. Gorsky
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 200-205
171 views DOI Abstract
2016
rashid al-din. shu’ab-i panjganah. 2. the mongols and the turks (2)
;Ch.I. Khamidova
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 868-880
329 views DOI Abstract
2016
incorporation of islamic institutions into political structure of the golden horde and post-golden horde states »
;Roman Pochekaev
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 115-127
203 views Abstract
Journament Score
29.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #20,529 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

29.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

22.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

45.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.